"despite their oppositions attempt to slander him and drag him through the mud."
REB:
Please. I am really curious. Why is it slander to say we attacked Iraq on grounds that turned out to be false (for whatever reason! It doesn't have to be that he lied), and that it was wrong to do so?
How is it Slander to say that there were no WMD in Iraq despite unequivocal claims that there were, in droves and even specific locations.
How is it slander to say that there were no Al-Qaeda connections despite unequivocal claims that there were, in droves and even specific locations?
Why is it Slander to say that we were wrong to attack Iraq, morally, on the basis of the two above?
Why must it be slander to point out TRUTHFUL claims that are NOT false?
is truth political?
Why is this slander, REB?
Davin
Current Events » in reply to re: So?
How is it slander?
The whole thread (56 posts)
- Support for Bush is still strong
- it's a long way to elections: predicting in a chaotic situation
- Don & Davin Right For A Change
- Spin City
- Poll Says Most Believe Saddam-9/11 link... Oh! Well! I guess that means its true then?
- re: Poll Says Most Believe Saddam-9/11 link
- You keep making this assertation that most Americans think Sadam was behind 9/11...Please post a link to the poll data.
- You don’t seem to have a problem with Don’s poll. I guess that means its true then?
- Surprise, REB - it's the same poll as your first link!
- Nobody started a war over the beliefs expressed in Dons polls, or is trying to justify one after the fact