Where is the proof, or do we just believe something like this is fact without any proof. Lindy's article is an editorial written by Christopher Scheer. A search in Google show this person has not published anything else but this top ten list. Not very credible.
All of his sorces are un-named. For example;
“Sold to Italian intelligence by some hustlerâ€
-an Italian intelligence agency? Some hustler? Names please
“the document carried the signature of an official who had been out of office for 10 years and referenced a constitution that was no longer in effect.â€
-“an official� names please.
“The ex-ambassador who the CIA sent to check out the story is pissedâ€
-“ex-ambassador� names please.
You are going to accuse the president of lying based on this?!
Do you people have it in for Bush so much you'll believe any of this drival?
Current Events » in reply to Bush did not lie?
re: Bush did not lie?
The whole thread (56 posts)
- Support for Bush is still strong
- it's a long way to elections: predicting in a chaotic situation
- Don & Davin Right For A Change
- Spin City
- Poll Says Most Believe Saddam-9/11 link... Oh! Well! I guess that means its true then?
- re: Poll Says Most Believe Saddam-9/11 link
- You keep making this assertation that most Americans think Sadam was behind 9/11...Please post a link to the poll data.
- You don’t seem to have a problem with Don’s poll. I guess that means its true then?
- Surprise, REB - it's the same poll as your first link!
- Nobody started a war over the beliefs expressed in Dons polls, or is trying to justify one after the fact