I've said it before, I voted for Gore.
After all, he appeared halfway intelligent, and was the only runner to even bring up the term nanotechnology. Now, I don't think I'd trade horses in midstream -- considering the clamorers scurrying about for that coveted saddle. And all that belly-achin' over Florida turned the Dem party into a three ringed circus. Well, that was pre-war, and I haven't seen much recovery from that front.
Changing presidents would likely degrade the War on Terror to a 90s aspect of lobbing a few grenades at noises from the dark, "impenetrable" forest of discontent, where the supposed enemies might be conspiring. No, we need someone who is going to go into those dark trees and physically sort the mess of the 20th century. A dirty, stinking business, and nothing I see the current prez-wannabes having the stomach to face.
Just another unbacked, useless opinion,
Dan
Current Events » in reply to re: He speaks for the average citizen
re: Speking for all Okies . . . ?
The whole thread (43 posts)
- Bush on Iraqi rebels-
- re: So much to rally behind . . .
- Maybe he should use a more diplomatic tone with regard to Sadam's freedom fighters.
- He speaks for the average citizen
- re: He speaks for the average citizen
- No, The King said this instead
- re: Speking for all Okies . . . ?
- re: He speaks for the average citizen
