So Belgium is benefitting from the destruciton of AQ and Belgium is lifting not a finger.
And to define Iraq under saddam out of the list of terror supporting nations is to engage in fantasy.
If, as you have claimed, AQ had nothing to do with Iraq, it is clear they do now.
But your premise claiming that the war against Saddam was unprovoked aggression is is a flase one.
Saddam was engaged in the support of terrorsists.
Saddam paid cash bounties to to terrorists.
Saddam gave safe haven for terrorists in his osn country.
Saddam had violated (to the profit of many in France, Belgium Germany and elsewhere) every aspect of the cease fire he agreed to.
So please disabuse yourself of the myth of US coalition aggression.
Spain was hit because they are doing something right, not something wrong. They are supporting and end to the appeasing policies and neglect that led to this.
BTW, please never tell an American that we are not at risk. AQ started this war on our soil.
And if war against terrorists is not the answer, what is?
Surrender?
Ed
Flame » in reply to re: Are you commuting every day to Madrid for work?
Uh, Raoul, the Al Qaeda declared war on the West
The whole thread (70 posts)
- The irresponsible Ed
- re: The irresponsible Ed
- Appeasers are the irresponsible ones.
- Them speaking German would be preferable to Arabic.
- you fucking moron
- re: you fucking moron
- Well dumb fuck, saddam took power in the 1970's...so another of Carter's great moves for peace
- You are an embarrassment to the right
- LOL!!!
- Hey, the little guy even remembers some of his old words! Great sign. (n/t)
- I meant that in a good way
- re: Are you commuting every day to Madrid for work?
- Wrong tree, Raoul.
- Wondered how long it would take to blame this on Bush. (n/t)
- re: How dare you!!!!!!!!!
- re: Next aim?
- The siren song of appeasment is very powerful right now.
