To me, Moore is just as offensive as Duke, only he gets international awards and millions of dollars to spread his lies and hate.

What part of "just as offensive" and "lies and hate" don't you understand?

Moore is a documented liar of the first order. People have documented 59 lies in F9/11. His other works don't come off any better under close examination.

As for No matter what you feel about Michael Moore you have to understand that the things he stands up for are compassionate in nature toward people that are oppressed or used or hurt.

What utter rubbish! Moore is in it for himself. Only the truly gullible would be naive enough to think otherwise. As Christopher Hutchins wrote in Slate (not exactly a right-wing publication):

To describe this film as dishonest and demagogic would almost be to promote those terms to the level of respectability. To describe this film as a piece of crap would be to run the risk of a discourse that would never again rise above the excremental. To describe it as an exercise in facile crowd-pleasing would be too obvious. Fahrenheit 9/11 is a sinister exercise in moral frivolity, crudely disguised as an exercise in seriousness. It is also a spectacle of abject political cowardice masking itself as a demonstration of "dissenting" bravery.

Personally, I'm glad he's on your side. For one thing, I wouldn't want that lying sack of excrement on my side. You see, a funny thing was reported in yesterday's Washington Post. In the 3 weeks since Moore's crockumentary came out, Bush's poll numbers on his handling of the war on terrorism have actually risen 4 points. Perhaps, people are seeing through Moore's pack of lies and realizing that they don't want the "Coalition of the Wild Eyed" anywhere near the Oval Office. Time will tell. We'll know in about 114 days.

BTW: It's interesting to see what's the #9 entry on the New York Times bestseller list this week. It seems a backlash is brewing against Moore.