Current Events » in reply to re: Clinton/Kerry advisor develops butterfingers

The whole thread (37 posts)

• Clinton advisor develops butterfingers - Tom Brosz - 7/20/2004 3:01:28 AM
  • More on the "socks" issue... - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 5:09:56 PM
  • Clueless Kerry suddenly drops Berger from his advisory staff (n/t) - p - 7/21/2004 1:23:05 PM
  • Another interesting item... - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 4:29:25 AM
  • I'm sure they'll get to the bottom of that faster than they find who outed Plame!! (n/t) - Bowser - 7/20/2004 9:25:47 PM
  • re: Clinton advisor develops butterfingers - Davin L. - 7/20/2004 7:40:38 PM
    • re: Clinton/Kerry advisor develops butterfingers - SteveS - 7/20/2004 11:45:59 PM
      • from your keyboard to berger's ears - Tony - 7/21/2004 1:56:31 AM
    • All of this - Davin L. - 7/20/2004 7:43:54 PM
  • re: Or maybe just light fingers. - Tom Brosz - 7/20/2004 6:13:50 PM
    • Oh, come on! Even if you engage in this partisan slanderfest, at least keep it reasonable! - Davin L. - 7/20/2004 7:23:15 PM
      • I guess we'll see, won't we? - Tom Brosz - 7/20/2004 7:44:36 PM
        • re: I guess we'll see, won't we? - Davin L. - 7/20/2004 7:54:42 PM
          • That "rag" was the New York Times - Tom Brosz - 7/20/2004 8:22:53 PM
            • re: That "rag" was the New York Times - Davin L. - 7/20/2004 8:45:31 PM
              • Fact check? Since when? - SteveS - 7/20/2004 11:56:29 PM
                • re: Fact check? Since when? - Davin L. - 7/21/2004 2:07:17 AM
                  • A more accurate assessment would be: - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 3:59:24 AM
                    • re: A more accurate assessment would be: - Davin L. - 7/21/2004 4:55:59 AM
                      • the reason Fox stands out is the same reason NPR stands out - p - 7/21/2004 5:20:11 PM
                • More on the media - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 12:40:18 AM
  • Why is this story comming to light days before the 9/11 report is released? - RobVG - 7/20/2004 4:40:14 PM
    • This will, of course, be the defense mode of the Democrats. - Tom Brosz - 7/20/2004 5:36:24 PM
      • Why did they feel that they needed to "specially mark" certain Clinton Administration documents? - Scott Evil - 7/20/2004 6:05:21 PM
    • Why did they take so long to release the story? - Larry J - 7/20/2004 4:56:08 PM
      • Seems similar to an 'October surprise'. - RobVG - 7/20/2004 5:16:07 PM
  • Belmont Club has a bit more on this - Tom Brosz - 7/20/2004 3:09:22 AM
    • A place for everthing - SteveS - 7/20/2004 3:37:30 AM
      • The smell test: would it count as cheating on a mid-term exam? - Scott Evil - 7/20/2004 2:08:10 PM
        • A better test... - Larry J - 7/20/2004 2:54:25 PM
          • What if Berger took the documents home. Made a few modifications. Then returned them. - Scott Evil - 7/20/2004 4:36:03 PM
          • A very useful test. - Tom Brosz - 7/20/2004 4:07:49 PM
            • Test results: - Tom Brosz - 7/20/2004 4:16:05 PM
              • Maybe you just gotta give em some time. - Tony - 7/20/2004 8:47:59 PM
                • Wonder why the didn't mention Berger by name in the title? - RobVG - 7/20/2004 9:28:19 PM
                  • now you're really reaching......... - Tony - 7/21/2004 1:54:28 AM
              • Maybe Berger is going around your town redacting the story from local editions of your paper. - Scott Evil - 7/20/2004 4:46:43 PM