"And I stand by my assertion that if this had been Rice, the media would already have crucified her in five-inch headlines instead of shoving the story to the back pages.
"
WHAT 'THE MEDIA' TOM!?
Go turn on your damn TV- I am working at home and its the lead story on CNN, MSNBC, CNBC, FOX and has even had airplay on the BBC for chrissakes! Check online! Its the main story on CNN currently!
Because you found one rag that didn't put it up front? Why do you blame them- don't you think that with all of the conflicting and unsourced allegations, some media sources mught just WAIT and try to get confirmed info before they parrot what other sources are saying??
You are so horny for bias you'll buy anything, even if you have to dream it up.
How on earth is it bias to go about parroting unsourced conflicting allegations that will (true or false) end a fellows career for good? Name the job this guy will get after this!
Davin L.
Current Events » in reply to I guess we'll see, won't we?
re: I guess we'll see, won't we?
The whole thread (37 posts)
- Clinton advisor develops butterfingers
- More on the "socks" issue...
- Clueless Kerry suddenly drops Berger from his advisory staff (n/t)
- Another interesting item...
- I'm sure they'll get to the bottom of that faster than they find who outed Plame!! (n/t)
- re: Clinton advisor develops butterfingers
- re: Or maybe just light fingers.
- Why is this story comming to light days before the 9/11 report is released?
- Belmont Club has a bit more on this
