I guess we'll see, won't we?

Current Events » in reply to Oh, come on! Even if you engage in this partisan slanderfest, at least keep it reasonable!

I guess we'll see, won't we?

Tom Brosz — 7/20/2004 7:44:36 PM (archived)

More on this is coming out all the time, and I agree it's one of those things where you need to wait for the noise to die down. For example, In this story, his defense team strongly objects to the "socks" line.

And I stand by my assertion that if this had been Rice, the media would already have crucified her in five-inch headlines instead of shoving the story to the back pages.

The whole thread (37 posts)

Clinton advisor develops butterfingers - Tom Brosz - 7/20/2004 3:01:28 AM
- More on the "socks" issue... - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 5:09:56 PM
- Clueless Kerry suddenly drops Berger from his advisory staff (n/t) - p - 7/21/2004 1:23:05 PM
- Another interesting item... - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 4:29:25 AM
- I'm sure they'll get to the bottom of that faster than they find who outed Plame!! (n/t) - Bowser - 7/20/2004 9:25:47 PM
- re: Clinton advisor develops butterfingers - Davin L. - 7/20/2004 7:40:38 PM
  - re: Clinton/Kerry advisor develops butterfingers - SteveS - 7/20/2004 11:45:59 PM
    - from your keyboard to berger's ears - Tony - 7/21/2004 1:56:31 AM
  - All of this - Davin L. - 7/20/2004 7:43:54 PM
- re: Or maybe just light fingers. - Tom Brosz - 7/20/2004 6:13:50 PM
  - Oh, come on! Even if you engage in this partisan slanderfest, at least keep it reasonable! - Davin L. - 7/20/2004 7:23:15 PM
    - I guess we'll see, won't we? - Tom Brosz - 7/20/2004 7:44:36 PM
      - re: I guess we'll see, won't we? - Davin L. - 7/20/2004 7:54:42 PM
        
        That "rag" was the New York Times - Tom Brosz - 7/20/2004 8:22:53 PM
        
        re: That "rag" was the New York Times - Davin L. - 7/20/2004 8:45:31 PM
        
        Fact check? Since when? - SteveS - 7/20/2004 11:56:29 PM
        
        re: Fact check? Since when? - Davin L. - 7/21/2004 2:07:17 AM
        
        A more accurate assessment would be: - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 3:59:24 AM
        
        re: A more accurate assessment would be: - Davin L. - 7/21/2004 4:55:59 AM
        
        the reason Fox stands out is the same reason NPR stands out - p - 7/21/2004 5:20:11 PM
        
        More on the media - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 12:40:18 AM
- Why is this story comming to light days before the 9/11 report is released? - RobVG - 7/20/2004 4:40:14 PM
  - This will, of course, be the defense mode of the Democrats. - Tom Brosz - 7/20/2004 5:36:24 PM
    - Why did they feel that they needed to "specially mark" certain Clinton Administration documents? - Scott Evil - 7/20/2004 6:05:21 PM
  - Why did they take so long to release the story? - Larry J - 7/20/2004 4:56:08 PM
    - Seems similar to an 'October surprise'. - RobVG - 7/20/2004 5:16:07 PM
- Belmont Club has a bit more on this - Tom Brosz - 7/20/2004 3:09:22 AM
  - A place for everthing - SteveS - 7/20/2004 3:37:30 AM
    - The smell test: would it count as cheating on a mid-term exam? - Scott Evil - 7/20/2004 2:08:10 PM
      - A better test... - Larry J - 7/20/2004 2:54:25 PM
        
        What if Berger took the documents home. Made a few modifications. Then returned them. - Scott Evil - 7/20/2004 4:36:03 PM
        
        A very useful test. - Tom Brosz - 7/20/2004 4:07:49 PM
        
        Test results: - Tom Brosz - 7/20/2004 4:16:05 PM
        
        Maybe you just gotta give em some time. - Tony - 7/20/2004 8:47:59 PM
        
        Wonder why the didn't mention Berger by name in the title? - RobVG - 7/20/2004 9:28:19 PM
        
        now you're really reaching......... - Tony - 7/21/2004 1:54:28 AM
        
        Maybe Berger is going around your town redacting the story from local editions of your paper. - Scott Evil - 7/20/2004 4:46:43 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (37 posts)