I'm sorry, what part of the "fifty million people" statement didn't come across?
And just as an aside:
Sit down and think about it. Given eight years of the Clinton administration to go by, do you really think Al Gore would have gone for a total regime change in Afghanistan? Or would it have been just the bombing? Like Clinton did in his policies, or for that matter, Reagan in dealing with Libya?
BTW, I am not prepared to concede that leaving Saddam and his sons in power for the next thirty or forty years, given their proven record on a number of issues, including WMD, territorial ambition, and support of terror on several fronts, and watched over by an international entity with a long and proven record of screwing up such duty, is a "better" outcome than what is going on right now.