Wow, interesting reference the author made there. Fascinating that with Muslims, adding that prefix makes them the bad guy (which I believe they are by the way) but when it's added to the "con" suffix here, it seems to be worn as a badge of honor by those so labeled. Tom, just as this author is the hope for the future of Islam, so should courageous individuals within the Republican party do the same to speak out against the ultra-conservatives of our country.
By including their voices in your party, you taint your own message. They're scary guys and wield tremendous power and we outsiders can't beat them on our own. It has to come from within your own silent majority that are riding their power coattails.
Current Events » in reply to Go back to the article Mary Anne linked to before.
Neo-Muslims
The whole thread (45 posts)
- Russia ready to strike against terror
- I re-state my prediction of a blood bath in Chechnya. Russia is not famous for mercy or moderation. (n/t)
- 50-60 thousand troops to Iraq would be a good start. (n/t)
- Agreed.
- It's called "anarchy".
- Hope they don't look too closely at northern Idaho... (n/t)
- they're still described as 'militants' by the press
- Words do matter.
- The Euphemism Collection
- re: You don't need to refer to them as Muslims. Its a given. Almost every terrorist is Muslim. Its a modern day fact. (n/t)
- Sort-of like calling all participants in organized crime "Italians".
- Nor males, nor deeply pigmented humans, nor Arabic-speakers...
- re: Good.
