But in some areas of the world, tapping every Mullah's phone might not be a bad idea.
I see a lot of things I don't post here. The penetration of radical Islamism into the infrastructure of the educational and religious policies of mainstream Islam is a serious problem. Most of the mosques in the United States are involved with or funded by the Wahabbi sect based in Saudi Arabia, and it's much worse in ostensibly secular nations like Egypt.
It is certainly true that a large majority of Muslims in the world are not subscribers to the radical philosophies. But if you subtract those who are neutral, or are not willing to speak out, I don't know how many are left.
How many articles like the example you found are there?
Current Events » in reply to Okaaaay....
I hate to say it...
The whole thread (45 posts)
- Russia ready to strike against terror
- I re-state my prediction of a blood bath in Chechnya. Russia is not famous for mercy or moderation. (n/t)
- 50-60 thousand troops to Iraq would be a good start. (n/t)
- Agreed.
- It's called "anarchy".
- Hope they don't look too closely at northern Idaho... (n/t)
- they're still described as 'militants' by the press
- Words do matter.
- The Euphemism Collection
- re: You don't need to refer to them as Muslims. Its a given. Almost every terrorist is Muslim. Its a modern day fact. (n/t)
- Sort-of like calling all participants in organized crime "Italians".
- Nor males, nor deeply pigmented humans, nor Arabic-speakers...
- re: Good.
