No Tom

Current Events » in reply to You'd start an atomic war over the withholding of oil?

No Tom

Art Martin — 10/6/2004 9:01:15 PM (archived)

I wouldn't start anything. You're the one that brought up Iraq's nuclear weapons. I was just stating the absurdity of them actually using them with the spector of our overwhelming superiority there.

Man, now I know how Barry Goldwater felt when they painted him as quick on the nuclear trigger.

The whole thread (39 posts)

An answer on "Global Test" - Tom Brosz - 10/6/2004 5:12:43 AM
- "Gobal Test" may have been an unfortunate choice of words. I wonder if "Global dialog" might not have been better. (n/t) - McFly - 10/6/2004 3:57:15 PM
- re: Nope... - Chris Vancil - 10/6/2004 10:14:04 AM
  - Here, a picture says a thousand words... - Tony - 10/6/2004 1:27:27 PM
    - I don't get the part where the cartoonist has to lie about what Kerry said to make what he said palatable - ebnelson - 10/6/2004 4:25:21 PM
      - Which part of this would you like me to help you to read? - Tony - 10/6/2004 4:30:56 PM
        
        So until Kerry saw opportunity, he was on board. - ebnelson - 10/6/2004 7:17:20 PM
        
        In one ear, out the other. I give up. (n/t) - Tony - 10/6/2004 8:05:04 PM
        
        Think, Tony....just try. (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/6/2004 8:35:17 PM
        
        I don't have the time to teach you English 101 (n/t) - tony - 10/6/2004 9:10:09 PM
        
        I will be pleased to test my English comprehension against yours anyday - ebnelson - 10/7/2004 12:26:39 AM
        
        English and History? - Tony - 10/7/2004 1:20:55 PM
        
        re: Why because you gave up long ago? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/6/2004 8:38:49 PM
        
        So what part of Kerry's decades in the Senate gives you the idea that he means this? - Tom Brosz - 10/6/2004 5:00:56 PM
        
        Kerry the wimp - Tony - 10/6/2004 7:04:04 PM
        
        I'll play if you apply the same rules to Bush/Cheney - Tony - 10/6/2004 6:13:07 PM
        
        Sorry, disregard the personal ones. Getting too testy myself. (n/t) - Tony - 10/6/2004 6:36:31 PM
        
        No offense taken. Seemed like reasonable shots to me. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/6/2004 6:41:28 PM
        
        Then answer them Godsdammit!!! ;-) (n/t) - Tony - 10/6/2004 7:05:38 PM
        
        Kennedy wouldn't have changed course... - Tony - 10/6/2004 5:53:46 PM
    - After - Tom Brosz - 10/6/2004 2:38:40 PM
      - Morality aside - FrankC - 10/6/2004 5:38:09 PM
        
        Thanks for the voice of reason Frank. - Art Martin - 10/6/2004 6:40:53 PM
        
        Foundation series... - Tom Brosz - 10/6/2004 6:56:48 PM
        
        the inevitable confrontation - FrankC - 10/6/2004 8:25:02 PM
        
        re: Foundation series... - Art Martin - 10/6/2004 7:05:06 PM
        
        You'd start an atomic war over the withholding of oil? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/6/2004 7:18:25 PM
        
        No Tom - Art Martin - 10/6/2004 9:01:15 PM
        
        not likely. too difficult to drill through glass (n/t) - Tony - 10/6/2004 7:08:19 PM
      - No Gulf War I - Art Martin - 10/6/2004 4:10:21 PM
        
        A more sedate response... - Tom Brosz - 10/6/2004 5:24:21 PM
        
        Okay, so we have... - Tom Brosz - 10/6/2004 5:15:52 PM
        
        re: Okay, so we have... - Art Martin - 10/6/2004 6:18:33 PM
        
        Not sure how you're arriving at these conclusions. - Tom Brosz - 10/6/2004 6:40:03 PM
        
        "I don't care if answers agree with me, but they should at least be answers that make sense." - Art Martin - 10/6/2004 7:01:24 PM
        
        I guess you are serious. - ebnelson - 10/6/2004 4:27:10 PM
        
        re: I guess you are serious. - Art Martin - 10/6/2004 11:51:15 PM
      - After, did - both past tense - Tony - 10/6/2004 3:00:41 PM
    - d'oh, sorry, directed to Tom...... (n/t) - Tony - 10/6/2004 1:28:03 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (39 posts)