Current Events » in reply to Obviously OJ should be voting then

The whole thread (35 posts)

• Voter Suppression Gains Momentum - Chris Vancil - 10/8/2004 8:18:32 AM
  • Just what we need, felons voting. Next we should set up polls in the prisons. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 10/10/2004 5:04:13 AM
    • Yeah, what worthless scum. Let's just shoot everyone upon conviction. - Mary Anne - 10/10/2004 11:48:24 AM
      • Felons should NOT be voting. It used to be that a felony conviction was a PERMANENT disqualification from voting. - David F Mayer - 10/10/2004 7:18:38 PM
        • Obviously OJ should be voting then - Art Martin - 10/11/2004 4:33:45 PM
          • We do NOT need felons voting. What will they vote for? For whatever helps felons commit felonies and escape punishment. - David F Mayer - 10/11/2004 5:38:24 PM
            • Just another post so you can repeat yourself again. - Art Martin - 10/11/2004 9:36:09 PM
        • May you receive the same degree of mercy for any problems you ever have, and any members of your family have, as you yourself exhibit. (n/t) - Mary Anne - 10/11/2004 11:21:47 AM
          • May you receive the same degree of mercy as these felons have shown for their victims. (None.) (n/t) - David F Mayer - 10/11/2004 5:39:31 PM
            • We create the world we live in. - Mary Anne - 10/11/2004 11:20:43 PM
            • All felonies have victims? Tell that to the guys in prison for marijuana. - Art Martin - 10/11/2004 9:46:18 PM
  • What does it say about a political party when they actively seek and court the felon vote? (n/t) - Lee - 10/8/2004 10:31:52 PM
  • The real story is leftis groups committing fraud. Period. (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/8/2004 4:07:04 PM
  • re: Voter Suppression Gains Momentum - Tom Brosz - 10/8/2004 3:58:39 PM
    • Clearly an anti-black racist. - David F Mayer - 10/10/2004 7:23:26 PM
    • Define "everyone" - Mary Anne - 10/8/2004 6:44:30 PM
      • Encouraging voting - Tom Brosz - 10/9/2004 4:39:23 PM
        • Sweeping aside nobility - Mary Anne - 10/10/2004 1:37:04 AM
          • re: Sweeping aside nobility - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2004 6:57:58 AM
            • Non-partisan means that people of any party can belong. - Mary Anne - 10/11/2004 11:17:24 AM
              • re: Non-partisan - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2004 5:25:38 PM
                • Because one party chooses to vilify the cause of a non-partisan organization does not make the non-partisans partisan. - Mary Anne - 10/11/2004 11:15:43 PM
      • re: Define "everyone" - gbaikie - 10/8/2004 8:09:02 PM
        • Try, just try, to follow what's going on here. - Mary Anne - 10/8/2004 9:31:47 PM
          • re: Try, just try, to follow what's going on here. - gbaikie - 10/9/2004 3:38:15 AM
            • Do you think that, if information is given, it should be complete and correct? - Mary Anne - 10/9/2004 11:17:49 AM
      • Official position? - Publius - 10/8/2004 7:49:05 PM
        • re: Official position? - gbaikie - 10/8/2004 8:19:42 PM
          • re: Official position? - Publius - 10/11/2004 6:11:08 PM
    • re: Voter Suppression Gains Momentum - Chris Vancil - 10/8/2004 5:35:39 PM
  • Yes, getting criminals to vote democrat is vital. - ebnelson - 10/8/2004 2:55:54 PM
    • Funny, I wonder how many of the convicted criminals from the Reagan administrations get to vote? - R.L. - 10/9/2004 2:45:08 PM
      • Whatever the number, a lot fewer than those from the clinton. (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/11/2004 7:10:54 PM
    • G. Gordon Liddy: a convicted felon who would still be in prison if President Carter hadn't commuted his sentence. - Mary Anne - 10/8/2004 6:33:48 PM
    • re: You're having a tuff time with reality aren't you. Ex-cons not Neocons you're getting them confused again. 8-) (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/8/2004 5:38:44 PM