I would love to find out how many Republicans are actually in any of these organizations, but you can bet this information would not be easy to find out.
I suppose some of these could be Republicans. Pick one.
At some point, whenever I point out the overload of Democrats in a particular group, like academia or the press, the people I am arguing with usually retreat to the idea that of COURSE more Democrats would be there, since they are prima facie, better, smarter, more perceptive, more sympathetic, and more reasonable than Republicans. End of discussion. Hasn't happened here yet, but if the thread kept going, it would pop up sooner or later.
I have seen enough "non-partisan" organizations that somehow always manage to favor one party over the other, that anyone invoking the phrase automatically makes me suspicious.
"Non-partisan" isn't what you say. It's what you do.
Current Events » in reply to Non-partisan means that people of any party can belong.
re: Non-partisan
The whole thread (35 posts)
- Voter Suppression Gains Momentum
- Just what we need, felons voting. Next we should set up polls in the prisons. (n/t)
- Yeah, what worthless scum. Let's just shoot everyone upon conviction.
- What does it say about a political party when they actively seek and court the felon vote? (n/t)
- The real story is leftis groups committing fraud. Period. (n/t)
- re: Voter Suppression Gains Momentum
- Yes, getting criminals to vote democrat is vital.
- Funny, I wonder how many of the convicted criminals from the Reagan administrations get to vote?
- G. Gordon Liddy: a convicted felon who would still be in prison if President Carter hadn't commuted his sentence.
- re: You're having a tuff time with reality aren't you. Ex-cons not Neocons you're getting them confused again. 8-) (n/t)
- Just what we need, felons voting. Next we should set up polls in the prisons. (n/t)