re: Try, just try, to follow what's going on here.

Current Events » in reply to Try, just try, to follow what's going on here.

re: Try, just try, to follow what's going on here.

gbaikie — 10/9/2004 3:38:15 AM (archived)

"Have you an issue with a state government clearly explaining its own state laws to all its citizens? "

I believe that IF the state misinformed people regarding the current law they do have an obligation to correct this. But I don't believe the state should be required by law to explain state law to it's citizens- I believe this information should be available but I don't think the state should mail this type of information- unless there is a specific law which directs this and funds it.

The whole thread (35 posts)

Voter Suppression Gains Momentum - Chris Vancil - 10/8/2004 8:18:32 AM
- Just what we need, felons voting. Next we should set up polls in the prisons. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 10/10/2004 5:04:13 AM
  - Yeah, what worthless scum. Let's just shoot everyone upon conviction. - Mary Anne - 10/10/2004 11:48:24 AM
    - Felons should NOT be voting. It used to be that a felony conviction was a PERMANENT disqualification from voting. - David F Mayer - 10/10/2004 7:18:38 PM
      - Obviously OJ should be voting then - Art Martin - 10/11/2004 4:33:45 PM
        
        We do NOT need felons voting. What will they vote for? For whatever helps felons commit felonies and escape punishment. - David F Mayer - 10/11/2004 5:38:24 PM
        
        Just another post so you can repeat yourself again. - Art Martin - 10/11/2004 9:36:09 PM
      - May you receive the same degree of mercy for any problems you ever have, and any members of your family have, as you yourself exhibit. (n/t) - Mary Anne - 10/11/2004 11:21:47 AM
        
        May you receive the same degree of mercy as these felons have shown for their victims. (None.) (n/t) - David F Mayer - 10/11/2004 5:39:31 PM
        
        We create the world we live in. - Mary Anne - 10/11/2004 11:20:43 PM
        
        All felonies have victims? Tell that to the guys in prison for marijuana. - Art Martin - 10/11/2004 9:46:18 PM
- What does it say about a political party when they actively seek and court the felon vote? (n/t) - Lee - 10/8/2004 10:31:52 PM
- The real story is leftis groups committing fraud. Period. (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/8/2004 4:07:04 PM
- re: Voter Suppression Gains Momentum - Tom Brosz - 10/8/2004 3:58:39 PM
  - Clearly an anti-black racist. - David F Mayer - 10/10/2004 7:23:26 PM
  - Define "everyone" - Mary Anne - 10/8/2004 6:44:30 PM
    - Encouraging voting - Tom Brosz - 10/9/2004 4:39:23 PM
      - Sweeping aside nobility - Mary Anne - 10/10/2004 1:37:04 AM
        
        re: Sweeping aside nobility - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2004 6:57:58 AM
        
        Non-partisan means that people of any party can belong. - Mary Anne - 10/11/2004 11:17:24 AM
        
        re: Non-partisan - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2004 5:25:38 PM
        
        Because one party chooses to vilify the cause of a non-partisan organization does not make the non-partisans partisan. - Mary Anne - 10/11/2004 11:15:43 PM
    - re: Define "everyone" - gbaikie - 10/8/2004 8:09:02 PM
      - Try, just try, to follow what's going on here. - Mary Anne - 10/8/2004 9:31:47 PM
        
        re: Try, just try, to follow what's going on here. - gbaikie - 10/9/2004 3:38:15 AM
        
        Do you think that, if information is given, it should be complete and correct? - Mary Anne - 10/9/2004 11:17:49 AM
    - Official position? - Publius - 10/8/2004 7:49:05 PM
      - re: Official position? - gbaikie - 10/8/2004 8:19:42 PM
        
        re: Official position? - Publius - 10/11/2004 6:11:08 PM
  - re: Voter Suppression Gains Momentum - Chris Vancil - 10/8/2004 5:35:39 PM
- Yes, getting criminals to vote democrat is vital. - ebnelson - 10/8/2004 2:55:54 PM
  - Funny, I wonder how many of the convicted criminals from the Reagan administrations get to vote? - R.L. - 10/9/2004 2:45:08 PM
    - Whatever the number, a lot fewer than those from the clinton. (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/11/2004 7:10:54 PM
  - G. Gordon Liddy: a convicted felon who would still be in prison if President Carter hadn't commuted his sentence. - Mary Anne - 10/8/2004 6:33:48 PM
  - re: You're having a tuff time with reality aren't you. Ex-cons not Neocons you're getting them confused again. 8-) (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/8/2004 5:38:44 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (35 posts)