Yoiu know, if I could just sweep aside the fog of nobility that has gotten so thick around here, can we all admit that both parties are doing their damnedest to make sure by any legitimate means that their voters turn out in greater numbers than the opposition's?
I still remember the Democrats trying to shut out the military vote on a technicality. Almost at the same time, they were examining chads through a microscope on ballots that would have been thrown out in any normal election, and claiming that "every vote is sacred."
The tables around my neighborhood have signs on them saying "Democrats register here," or "Republicans register here." Obviously, anyone can register at either place, but there's still a subtle barrier there, isn't there? Especially if the potential voter isn't too bright.
So, let's lose the haloes, shall we? They never look very good on politicians.
Current Events » in reply to Define "everyone"
Encouraging voting
The whole thread (35 posts)
- Voter Suppression Gains Momentum
- Just what we need, felons voting. Next we should set up polls in the prisons. (n/t)
- Yeah, what worthless scum. Let's just shoot everyone upon conviction.
- What does it say about a political party when they actively seek and court the felon vote? (n/t)
- The real story is leftis groups committing fraud. Period. (n/t)
- re: Voter Suppression Gains Momentum
- Yes, getting criminals to vote democrat is vital.
- Funny, I wonder how many of the convicted criminals from the Reagan administrations get to vote?
- G. Gordon Liddy: a convicted felon who would still be in prison if President Carter hadn't commuted his sentence.
- re: You're having a tuff time with reality aren't you. Ex-cons not Neocons you're getting them confused again. 8-) (n/t)
- Just what we need, felons voting. Next we should set up polls in the prisons. (n/t)