Mark, I so agree that we've had some successes with our tips but it certainly sounds like we've been misled as much as we've been steered correctly. The problem lies in the use of bombings to go after the targets. We get assurances from our military that they have on-the-ground intel prior to missile and bomb attacks but it sure seems that those are easily countered in public opinion if even one woman or child dies in the explosions. It's pretty hard for us to show we were right when our supposed targets are only bits of flesh and bone.
I can certainly buy the concept that our intentions are almost always honorable in our attacks but it just seems our public relations info is steps behind the media of the rest of the world, particulaly the Arab news stations. Just does not sound like we are proactively courting that resource. Have you ever once seen a surveillance videotape of a suspected target on a post-bombing news conference that counters the assertion that what we hit was a wedding party or birthday?
Flame » in reply to Where Do You Think We Keep Getting Target Info From?
and what percentage of that target info has proven false?
The whole thread (62 posts)
- If we're winning the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people.....
- ??
- Screw you Art we never liked you much anyway
- re:Revealing
- Who's the "we'? (n/t)
- The owners of the board (n/t)
- I had no real problems with him.
- You DA MAN, FrankC. DA MAN!
- You DA MAN, FrankC. DA MAN!
- For a change, a pretty good thread resurrected...
- What the CIA, Mao and some others say about this. And they all agree.
- Almost all of our target information comes from Iraqis.
- Where Do You Think We Keep Getting Target Info From?
- and what percentage of that target info has proven false?
- Too bad it's not good data, isn't it?
- Perhaps you are really responding to agenda driven enws reporting?
