Current Events » in reply to Read for content: The ACLU has sued to have the courts censor public display and discussion of ideas with religious content.

The whole thread (28 posts)

• Republicans Admit Mailing Campaign Literature Saying Liberals Will Ban the Bible - Chris Vancil - 10/15/2004 8:49:17 AM
  • What the religious should consider - Art Martin - 10/19/2004 6:41:38 PM
  • And what has the ACLU successfully done? - ebnelson - 10/15/2004 2:29:00 PM
    • It's a lie, Ed. Last time I went to church there was a bible, and in the last Hilton I was in and in my dentists office (who is a Buddhist, btw.) ACLU has nothing to do with this lie. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/15/2004 10:05:51 PM
      • Read for content: The ACLU has sued to have the courts censor public display and discussion of ideas with religious content. - ebnelson - 10/16/2004 3:59:44 PM
        • re: Do you know what the bible is? A lie is a lie. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/16/2004 7:59:05 PM
          • re: My public library has several copies of the bible. (above mentioned lie is that of the RNC not the bible) (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/16/2004 8:01:26 PM
      • So which Hilton were you in, Nicky or Paris? (n/t) - Art Martin - 10/15/2004 11:35:39 PM
        • re: So what's your middle name, Art? - Mary Anne - 10/16/2004 2:30:36 AM
          • re: So what's your middle name, Art? - Art Martin - 10/17/2004 7:07:19 AM
    • ACLU has no party affiliation - Art Martin - 10/15/2004 9:15:09 PM
      • You are of course kidding. - ebnelson - 10/15/2004 9:35:40 PM
        • You do know they can't pass law right? - Art Martin - 10/15/2004 11:01:41 PM
          • With activist judges married to ACLU lawyers, they don't need to. - ebnelson - 10/16/2004 3:28:26 PM
    • The ACLU has banned all public displays of religion in the country, you say? What country would that be? - Mary Anne - 10/15/2004 3:38:17 PM
      • If that is all the ACLU had done, no. - ebnelson - 10/15/2004 4:30:05 PM
        • Yes, that's exactly what the ACLU has done. - Mary Anne - 10/15/2004 5:11:40 PM
          • The religious expression you refer to are strictly private - ebnelson - 10/15/2004 8:18:04 PM
            • As they should be. Religion is private. But they aren't all hidden. - Mary Anne - 10/16/2004 2:22:11 AM
              • YOu read at least as much as anyone here. You know the agenda is progressing far into censorship and ahs in fact done so. - ebnelson - 10/16/2004 4:09:11 PM
                • You obviously have no idea what it means to separate church and state. - Mary Anne - 10/16/2004 4:35:28 PM
                  • Havnig a blessing before a game is oppression? - ebnelson - 10/18/2004 7:14:42 PM
                    • What about the freedom of the minority and tolerance of their religious beliefs? Do people only count if they're part of the majority? - Mary Anne - 10/19/2004 5:00:05 AM
                      • re: What about the freedom of the minority and tolerance of their religious beliefs? Do people only count if they're part of the majority? - gbaikie - 10/19/2004 11:29:53 AM
                        • Public vs. private, required vs. optional, and the conservation of identity in an inhospitable environment, or, Why do you think the Jews wanted Israel to be a Jewish state? - Mary Anne - 10/19/2004 1:45:38 PM
                          • re: Public vs. private, required vs. optional, and the conservation of identity in an inhospitable environment, or, Why do you think the Jews wanted Israel to be a Jewish state? - gbaikie - 10/20/2004 12:56:34 AM
                            • I haven't been a member of any organized religion since 1974. - Mary Anne - 10/20/2004 11:45:32 AM
                  • I'm With Mary Anne 100% On This One - Mark Eby - 10/17/2004 2:22:42 AM