Imagine, if you will, a devout Jew and his family at a high school football game. Imagine that their son is playing. Or imagine that one of their children is in the band, a more serious thing for a child pursuing a musical education because attendence at performances is a mandatory part of the grade.
Up in the stands, we hear, "And now bow your heads as Reverend Joe Blow from Calvary Baptist Church says the invocation."
"Dear Lord, we ask your protection for our players here today, blah blah blah blah... In Jesus's name we pray. Amen."
Now, why the hell should a Jewish kid, or for that matter a kid from any non-Christian family, have to put up with someone else including him or her in a prayer to a deity that he or she does not accept? (In the case of the Jewish kid, it's no less than idolatry to worship a human being! But that's OK, I suppose, because they're "only Jews".) It would be different if the kid's attendence were not required, or if the event were not paid for using money coming from taxpayers who are not all Christian either.
I suppose non-Christians should consider themselves lucky. After all, in the past they would have been stoned or burned to death! How far we have come, that they only need to suppress their religious identities so that the majority can use their power to express their religion as an extension of public policy.
Several years ago, a group of parents in a neighboring school district became very vocal when high school Homecoming was scheduled during Rosh Hoshana, the Jewish High Holy Days. Of course, their children had to choose between the heart of their religion and a very important school activity. Instead of being understanding and attempting to reschedule the event, do you know what the Christian majority did? They accused the Jewish families of being troublemakers and malcontents, and refused to cooperate. By contrast, no major school activities have ever been scheduled over Christmas. No school activities at all are scheduled over Christmas. Tell me how fair, how respectful of freedom, how tolerant the religious majority is. I'll try to keep a straight face, but it won't be easy. Don't you dare tell me how your speech has been oppressed just because you can't have your way all the time.
It's easy for the majority to be free. They hold most of the cards. It's also easy to be tolerant of those like ourselves. I suggest you remember that the next time some Christian is treated shabbily in a non-Christian part of the world.
Current Events » in reply to Havnig a blessing before a game is oppression?
What about the freedom of the minority and tolerance of their religious beliefs? Do people only count if they're part of the majority?
The whole thread (28 posts)
- Republicans Admit Mailing Campaign Literature Saying Liberals Will Ban the Bible
- What the religious should consider
- And what has the ACLU successfully done?
- It's a lie, Ed. Last time I went to church there was a bible, and in the last Hilton I was in and in my dentists office (who is a Buddhist, btw.) ACLU has nothing to do with this lie. (n/t)
- ACLU has no party affiliation
- The ACLU has banned all public displays of religion in the country, you say? What country would that be?
- If that is all the ACLU had done, no.
- Yes, that's exactly what the ACLU has done.
- The religious expression you refer to are strictly private
- As they should be. Religion is private. But they aren't all hidden.
- YOu read at least as much as anyone here. You know the agenda is progressing far into censorship and ahs in fact done so.
- You obviously have no idea what it means to separate church and state.
- Havnig a blessing before a game is oppression?
- What about the freedom of the minority and tolerance of their religious beliefs? Do people only count if they're part of the majority?
- re: What about the freedom of the minority and tolerance of their religious beliefs? Do people only count if they're part of the majority?
- What about the freedom of the minority and tolerance of their religious beliefs? Do people only count if they're part of the majority?
- I'm With Mary Anne 100% On This One
- Havnig a blessing before a game is oppression?
- You obviously have no idea what it means to separate church and state.
- YOu read at least as much as anyone here. You know the agenda is progressing far into censorship and ahs in fact done so.
- As they should be. Religion is private. But they aren't all hidden.
- The religious expression you refer to are strictly private
- Yes, that's exactly what the ACLU has done.
- If that is all the ACLU had done, no.
