People cannot start games or graduation ceremonies as they wish anymore, if the ACLU deems the speech they use to have religious content.
That a seasonal creche, put up anywhere, would depend on who has title to the land as to whether permission to display it was correct is ridiculous.
Christmas is what it is, and to censor displays of Christmas sentiment becuase some people claim their interpretation of those displays are offensive is ridiculous. The ACLU is after a Christian-religious content free public space. They claim the right, through their lawsuits, to decide and censor what they wish. They can pose as principaled fighters all they want, but they are cheap fascists everytime they do it.
Children cannot even sing traditional Christmas songs in public school, because someone mught here the word 'Christ' of 'God'. We honor heritages of every part of the American culture, except religious heritage. That is intellectual dishonesty of the lowest order. Respecting and openly expressing religious thought is not creation of a state church or the imposition of religious tyranny. But the ACLU is imposing a tyranny on the poeple, and seems to enjoy doing it.
The ACLU is for censorship. Whatever their motive, they are only for the sepration of people from their freedom.
Ed
Current Events » in reply to As they should be. Religion is private. But they aren't all hidden.
YOu read at least as much as anyone here. You know the agenda is progressing far into censorship and ahs in fact done so.
The whole thread (28 posts)
- Republicans Admit Mailing Campaign Literature Saying Liberals Will Ban the Bible
- What the religious should consider
- And what has the ACLU successfully done?
- It's a lie, Ed. Last time I went to church there was a bible, and in the last Hilton I was in and in my dentists office (who is a Buddhist, btw.) ACLU has nothing to do with this lie. (n/t)
- ACLU has no party affiliation
- The ACLU has banned all public displays of religion in the country, you say? What country would that be?
- If that is all the ACLU had done, no.
- Yes, that's exactly what the ACLU has done.
- The religious expression you refer to are strictly private
- As they should be. Religion is private. But they aren't all hidden.
- YOu read at least as much as anyone here. You know the agenda is progressing far into censorship and ahs in fact done so.
- You obviously have no idea what it means to separate church and state.
- Havnig a blessing before a game is oppression?
- What about the freedom of the minority and tolerance of their religious beliefs? Do people only count if they're part of the majority?
- re: What about the freedom of the minority and tolerance of their religious beliefs? Do people only count if they're part of the majority?
- What about the freedom of the minority and tolerance of their religious beliefs? Do people only count if they're part of the majority?
- I'm With Mary Anne 100% On This One
- Havnig a blessing before a game is oppression?
- You obviously have no idea what it means to separate church and state.
- YOu read at least as much as anyone here. You know the agenda is progressing far into censorship and ahs in fact done so.
- As they should be. Religion is private. But they aren't all hidden.
- The religious expression you refer to are strictly private
- Yes, that's exactly what the ACLU has done.
- If that is all the ACLU had done, no.