Read the "Kingdom of God" by Mary Ann. She makes sense without using any numbers, if you can not understand her view point, then you should join some organization that teaches how to interpret the universal laws without using numbers. I understand that the Buddhist Monks ponder those questions, such activity may help you too.
R.L."Then maybe you are a lunatic.... "
J-- "Lunatic" is that the same as a tic from luna (moon). I seem to remember that when I was very young, I went outside on a cold winter night when the moon was full and after a while I did "shiver" but I thought that it was due to the cold and not the moon. :-)
R.L.--"The fact is you have shown that you cannot handle simple math-"
J-- Then perhaps I can handle complex math. I did come to the conclusion that E=(U/K)C gives the same answer as E=MC squared. You can put numbers into the formulas if you understand it better that way.
R.L.--" you have a deluision that you advocate without any proof or scientific backing- that is garbage!!"
J-- I do not understand where the "deluision" would come from, perhaps you can enlighten me by answering the following questions.
A) Radioactivity in the atmosphere can accelerate the atmospheric molecules. True or False ? (no need for numbers, just true or false / yes or no.)
B) Molecules that are above the "thermosphere" can escape the Earth's gravitational influence if their velocity is high enough. True or False / yes or no.
C) If a large quantity of molecules is removed from the Earth's atmosphere then the atmospheric density will decrease. True or False?
D) If the atmospheric density decreases then the wind velocities will increase. True or False?
E) According to Bernoulli's principle, fast moving air exerts a lower pressure than slow moving air. True or false?
F) The atmospheric pressure against the Earth equals the pressure of the Earth against the atmosphere. True or False?
G) The atmosphere rests on the Earth's surface with the weight equivalent to a layer of water thirty four feet deep. True or False?
H) One liter of water weighs one kilogram. True or False?
I base my hypothesis on the above information, if the information is wrong, then please let me know where the errors are.
R.L.--"Do you think we just study the behavior of a certain frequency of light?"
J-- No, I assume that you have studied many frequencies of light, but have not APPLIED that knowledge to extremely low frequencies, whether the low frequencies are electromagnetic or mechanical.
R.L.--"The same laws apply to all frequencies... it is just a matter of knowing how to apply those laws- and YOU DONT HAVE A DAMN CLUE!!!!!"
J-- WHY DO YOU SHOUT WHEN YOU MAKE ACCUSATIONS?
R.L.--"If this upsets you then go pee in the ocean, by your logic it will drown me even though I live at 2500 feet...
I am fine with accepting that people believe in religion, but if you DARE claim scientific credibility you DAMN well better back it up!!! You cant.... You have been totally disproven and you ignored the fact that you were about 12 orders of magnitude off (that is a thousand billion in case you are as stupid as you seem here)"
J-- The principles of WHY things can happen is not based on numbers, numbers can give you quantities and if those quantities are obtained from accurate observations and measurements, then I would consider the results scientific.
Your numbers were not taken from observations or measurements of the applicable data.
Johannes
Off Topic » in reply to If it only takes 15 minutes to come up with hard numbers proving that you are a complete lunatic....
re: You missed my point.
The whole thread (40 posts)
- More facile answers to an impossible dillemma
- re: Blaming God
- The Kingdom of God
- He is at least well reasoned
- The 'faithful' cant have it both ways....
- Actually they can............
- re: both ways....
- well argued
- re: The 'faithful'
- I find it interesting
