Are you playing it clueless for laughs, SDAI-Tech1? Seriously, man, you're batting a thousand in the Bizarro perceptions department.
Even though you're being a bit ambiguous about it, let's assume that you don't approve of ethnic cleansing. Clearly, Bowser doesn't approve of it either. I don't approve of ethnic cleansing. The three of us are in agreement.
What is it you object to? That Bowser's accusing Israel of ethnic cleansing? Why should Israel, or any country, get a pass on the issue? Isn't it bad no matter who does it?
I've said before that the issue isn't whether Bowser has his facts right. It's that he possesses a powerful moral compass and speaks and acts consistently according to his beliefs. Now that I think about it, all you're objecting to is that your sacred cows are being gored by Bowser's sense of morality. Oh whaaaaa! Grow up.
But to return to the subject of Israel and ethnic cleansing, this is a case where Bowser can be demonstrated to in fact have a leg to stand on. Consider a definition:
The term ethnic cleansing refers to various policies of forcibly removing people of one ethnic group. At one end of the spectrum, it is virtually indistinguishable from forced emigration and population transfer, while at the other it merges with deportation and genocide.
At the most general level, however, ethnic cleansing can be understood as the forced expulsion of an "undesirable" population from a given territory as a result of religious or ethnic discrimination, political, strategic or ideological considerations, or a combination of these.
Wikipedia
Please, Techie, enlighten us about how Israel's relationship with the Palestinians over the years can be spun as something other than the milder form of ethnic cleansing.
You're still suffering from cranial-rectal insertion, Techie. Bowser's moral instincts are the gold standard, and you're trying to peddle spray-painted lead.