Actually it would be anti-American...........

Flame » in reply to re: What Gary's definition of a traitor should have been

Actually it would be anti-American...........

Publius — 12/7/2005 4:32:33 PM (archived)

To NOT insist that Saddam get the best defense possible. This is the core of the American jurisprudence system.

To not agree with Saddam being adequately defended brands you as being un-American.

Publius

The whole thread (118 posts)

The reason lawyers get no respect - or - What Gary's definition of a traitor should have been - Buck Galaxy - 12/6/2005 8:30:12 AM
- re: The reason lawyers get respect - - Publius - 12/7/2005 4:40:14 PM
  - Meh... - Todd - 12/11/2005 3:31:55 PM
  - I agree with the principle, but - Buck Galaxy - 12/8/2005 3:50:43 AM
  - Agreed... - McFly - 12/7/2005 7:13:19 PM
    - The problem is... - Tom Brosz - 12/8/2005 10:41:32 PM
      - You may be right. Let's wait and see. - alcaray - 12/8/2005 11:30:09 PM
    - Your friend is correct....... - Publius - 12/8/2005 6:46:18 PM
- I think that is pretty much what Gary had in mind (n/t) - FrankC - 12/7/2005 5:43:07 AM
  - I see. People here were defending Saddam Hussein. - Daniel - 12/7/2005 6:22:47 AM
    - As I stated at the time - FrankC - 12/8/2005 4:29:56 AM
      - agreed on this point: - Daniel - 12/8/2005 6:03:10 AM
    - Actually some were. They know who they are. (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/7/2005 9:32:23 AM
      - "I have here in my hands a list of domestic Saddamists..." (n/t) - DSAI-etch-1000 - 12/7/2005 6:03:48 PM
      - BS. Put up or shut up. (n/t) - alcaray - 12/7/2005 4:06:54 PM
        
        Short term memory must be a blessing of sorts. - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/8/2005 2:59:56 AM
        
        A Rather Blunt Postscript - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/8/2005 6:06:40 PM
        
        Yeah, some people have a rapier wit, but Techie's is a blunt instrument (n/t) - Robert - 12/9/2005 5:04:19 PM
        
        Love the wealth of input generated. Guess I finally pinned em to a point they can't defend. - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/9/2005 3:06:30 AM
        
        Why argue with you? You have already concluded that dissent from Bush's opinion is treason. (n/t) - Mary Anne - 12/10/2005 7:38:30 PM
        
        Re: treason, sedition and subversive elements - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/10/2005 10:07:34 PM
        
        â€œThat we are to stand by the president, right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.â€ (n/t) - Theodore Roosevelt - 12/11/2005 6:33:49 PM
        
        My apologies to Bowser. - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/11/2005 11:20:32 AM
        
        re: My apologies to Bowser. - Lindy - 12/11/2005 6:18:08 PM
        
        "A subversive is easily spotted once one knows what to look for" - Lindy - 12/11/2005 7:35:13 AM
        
        Personally I think Bowser is much more patriotic than thou (n/t) - Laurie Street - 12/11/2005 1:55:56 AM
        
        Palestine needs all the patriots it can get. (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/11/2005 3:46:40 AM
        
        Note that no one is actually worked up about this insulting stuff of yours. - alcaray - 12/9/2005 5:35:11 PM
        
        Amazingly, it's generated the longest sub-thread. - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/10/2005 3:51:57 AM
        
        Defend what exactly? - Tony - 12/9/2005 5:07:43 PM
        
        pathetic and hysterical drivel (n/t) - Daniel - 12/9/2005 2:16:19 AM
        
        "It's laughable." - Tony - 12/8/2005 7:30:49 PM
        
        ;~) Double ;~) ;~) - Lindy - 12/8/2005 6:39:06 PM
        
        Sorry you feel that way - alcaray - 12/8/2005 6:10:58 PM
        
        I only have time to get thru F, but just wanted to point out what an insulting crock this is. - alcaray - 12/8/2005 4:05:05 PM
        
        Shorter Techie - Meinungsverschiedenheit ist verboten - Tony - 12/8/2005 3:07:09 PM
        
        And another thing... - Robert - 12/8/2005 4:41:16 AM
        
        Life's tough - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/8/2005 5:36:01 AM
        
        Oh gawd, It's worse than I thought - Robert - 12/9/2005 5:08:24 PM
        
        just use a simple generic word for the lot of them - Daniel - 12/8/2005 4:56:16 AM
        
        So have you traced your lineage there Daniel... - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/10/2005 4:01:03 AM
        
        our horses are scrupulously honest - Daniel - 12/10/2005 10:45:18 PM
        
        Good one! (n/t) - Robert - 12/8/2005 4:57:31 AM
        
        NOT ONE of those posts were remotely pro-Saddam Hussein. You'd better start being more careful; you're obviously lying and slandering here - Daniel - 12/8/2005 4:28:25 AM
        
        You know Techie personally? - Tony - 12/8/2005 3:02:59 PM
        
        it's a 'generic' diatribe, meant for anyone who fits the description (n/t) - Daniel - 12/8/2005 4:13:51 PM
        
        Go Daniel - Lindy - 12/8/2005 6:21:46 AM
        
        no more - Daniel - 12/8/2005 6:34:40 AM
        
        That's fine with me...just so long as... - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/8/2005 7:10:24 AM
        
        Style is a crucial element in the art of flaming - Robert - 12/8/2005 4:56:36 AM
        
        style is irrelevant Robert. Here's some more CONTENT: - Daniel - 12/8/2005 5:04:09 AM
        
        Irrationality must be an even greater comfort - Robert - 12/8/2005 4:24:39 AM
        
        "Ninny? NINNY??" - Lindy - 12/8/2005 6:35:39 AM
        
        Thank goodness this is flame - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/8/2005 5:23:37 AM
        
        Well sharpen your knife: I'm pro-Muslim. - alcaray - 12/8/2005 7:03:55 PM
        
        re: Well sharpen your knife: I'm pro-Muslim. - Lindy - 12/8/2005 9:15:48 PM
        
        Yes, it is - Robert - 12/8/2005 6:52:17 PM
        
        "You have your head jammed so far up your ass, Techie, that you won't see daylight the rest of your life." - Lindy - 12/8/2005 9:20:44 PM
        
        See my postscript above. - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/8/2005 7:27:21 PM
        
        Mmmm, I'd give it about a 6.7, I think - Robert - 12/8/2005 10:48:35 PM
        
        You give new meaning to "the blind 'leading' the blind" - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/9/2005 2:51:55 AM
        
        Such fine irony - Robert - 12/9/2005 5:03:20 PM
        
        So you're with Bowser chasing the chuck-up wagon? - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/10/2005 3:36:37 AM
        
        if you lower the bar any further you'll have to dig a trench (n/t) - Daniel - 12/9/2005 4:14:28 AM
        
        Can you clarify what my error about the UN was? Then I will attempt to wax eloquent. (n/t) - alcaray - 12/8/2005 9:32:40 PM
        
        WHAT?? "Stand with Bowser and you will smell bad and need a change of clothes in short order" - Lindy - 12/8/2005 9:26:53 PM
        
        "You, and many others here, kindly overlook this just like you overlook the UN's culpability and coziness with Saddam's atrocities. " - Lindy - 12/8/2005 9:23:45 PM
        
        Yo Techie! - Lindy - 12/8/2005 6:26:35 AM
        
        stop referring to me as an 'Aussie leftist' just because I support free speech and the right to dissent - Daniel - 12/8/2005 5:27:25 AM
        
        Don't be so touchy! - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/8/2005 5:30:08 AM
        
        I was referring to your noun 'leftist', not your adjective 'Aussie' - Daniel - 12/8/2005 5:34:54 AM
        
        Are you a rightist? Centrist? - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/8/2005 5:37:23 AM
        
        yes, that's totally relevant here isn't it - Daniel - 12/8/2005 6:09:14 AM
        
        role of 'patriotism' in all this - Daniel - 12/8/2005 5:16:07 AM
        
        What would you expect from the descendants of criminals? - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/8/2005 5:27:32 AM
        
        ick (n/t) - alcaray - 12/8/2005 6:44:50 PM
        
        step by step deconstruction of this dreck: - Daniel - 12/8/2005 5:54:48 AM
        
        Patriotism must be a blessing of sorts. - Lindy - 12/8/2005 3:28:37 AM
        
        Here SDAI......... - Lindy - 12/8/2005 3:47:18 AM
        
        Sorry D-dawg. Does not compute. - more SDAI-wretch misattribution - 12/8/2005 3:19:49 AM
        
        re: Sorry D-dawg. Does not compute. - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/8/2005 7:03:55 AM
        
        I don't know... - Tom Brosz - 12/8/2005 3:06:22 AM
        
        You really thought those were pro-Saddam, Tom? (n/t) - alcaray - 12/8/2005 4:00:10 PM
        
        Perhaps a more level headed conservative could explain it to us poor lefties. - Tony - 12/8/2005 7:34:20 PM
        
        re: explain it to us poor lefties. - Tom Brosz - 12/8/2005 8:24:53 PM
        
        Question too hard? (n/t) - alcaray - 12/8/2005 9:34:46 PM
        
        No. More like left-heavy brains are too soft...mushy even. ;-) (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/8/2005 10:03:26 PM
        
        Mine is clearly too mushy to derive a "yes" or a "no" from Tom's response (n/t) - alcaray - 12/8/2005 10:19:07 PM
        
        Oh, NOW we get binary! ;) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 12/8/2005 10:39:01 PM
        
        Hah! (n/t) - alcaray - 12/8/2005 11:32:57 PM
        
        re: I know... - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/8/2005 3:09:37 AM
      - is that so? I don't remember any posts here like that - Daniel - 12/7/2005 12:52:19 PM
- re: What Gary's definition of a traitor should have been - Tom Brosz - 12/6/2005 8:01:49 PM
  - Actually it would be anti-American........... - Publius - 12/7/2005 4:32:33 PM
    - Shut up. - alcaray - 12/7/2005 6:32:39 PM
  - Anti-Americanism. - et - 12/7/2005 4:09:27 AM
    - re: Anti-Americanism. - Tom Brosz - 12/7/2005 7:24:06 AM
      - A.N.S.W.E.R. and Ramsey Clark - et - 12/7/2005 5:31:54 PM
        
        No. You're not familiar with either of them. - Tom Brosz - 12/8/2005 1:18:22 AM
        
        Where is it then? I asked for links.... (n/t) - et - 12/8/2005 5:52:11 PM
        
        Do the work yourself for a change. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 12/8/2005 8:15:57 PM
        
        You made the assertion. Put up or shut up! (n/t) - et - 12/8/2005 11:52:18 PM
        
        All right. - Tom Brosz - 12/9/2005 9:20:28 AM
        
        BROsz-Bot - SDAI-Tech1 - 12/9/2005 4:37:44 AM
        
        Interesting... - Tom Brosz - 12/9/2005 9:01:03 AM
  - re: re:Not even - Raoul - 12/6/2005 9:42:20 PM
    - "Ah, patriotism, that word has bad connotations over here." Believe me, it shows. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 12/7/2005 12:25:20 AM
      - Shows over here too. You have redefined it to mean something partisan and dangerous. (n/t) - alcaray - 12/7/2005 5:40:43 PM
        
        How about riots going on for months? (n/t) - gbaikie - 12/7/2005 7:10:03 PM
        
        Huh? (n/t) - alcaray - 12/7/2005 10:20:31 PM
  - On the other hand... - Fox - 12/6/2005 8:11:09 PM
    - re: On the other hand...John Adams - phil - 12/7/2005 4:41:04 PM
      - I knew *you'd* get it, Phil - Fox - 12/7/2005 7:11:09 PM
        
        If the comparison of Adams and Clark was accurate... - Tom Brosz - 12/8/2005 1:22:32 AM
        
        "praising the British for killing some of them." Another unsupported slander. PUOSU. (n/t) - et - 12/8/2005 11:53:42 PM
        
        See earlier answer. That's all you get. - Tom Brosz - 12/9/2005 6:16:52 PM
        
        Why revere #2.... - et - 12/7/2005 10:46:52 PM
        
        re: Why revere #2? - Fox - 12/9/2005 4:47:38 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (118 posts)