Listen, there's plenty of acrimony associated with this thread, but it's not a "threat" thread. It's for the most part, a technical discussion with much discourtiousness. However with a contentious issue here at the HZ, even on space, when has it EVER been different? The sooner you let it go, the sooner this thread will fall below the line. It's already over. Moving on...
We know that some here need to overprint every issue possible with their political and psycho-social opinions and that has dragged this thread a bit from a scientific-technical discussion. But it happens all the time. Even here on Space. To single this thread out is unfair, and my foul language aside, I resent it.
Come-on buddy, Voltaire up. :)
Space/Science » in reply to Talking of precedents
Talking.
The whole thread (64 posts)
- UCS on nuclear bunker-busting
- re: B61-11
- Well I sure hope this guy understands what fallout could do!
- When you guys have finished with the foul language, can we have this on CE, please? (n/t)
- *Nick, why do you feel this is off topic?
- re: *Nick, why do you feel this is off topic?
- I think this is on-topic....
- Pardon the language please Nick.
- *Nick, why do you feel this is off topic?
- Are they stupid or what?
- yes Lee, we know you could give a shit about brown people.
- Lee has a point.
- Sure, if you're an effin idiot. (how's that MB?)
- Surprisingly reserved... ;) (n/t)
- The bunker buster is by it's very nature a subsurface device.
- Your ignorance is astounding
- Speaking of an effing idiot....
- 20 feet?
- Hell of a difference, Lee
- No, et is correct, and you are an idiot....
- And the obligitory wikipedia article.
- And here's a more "nuclear" specific source that claims 10 yards.
- 20 feet of concrete.
- 20 feet?
- Sure, if you're an effin idiot. (how's that MB?)
- **Mind the language, et** (n/t)
- Lee has a point.
- yes Lee, we know you could give a shit about brown people.
