alright I'll accept that. I may have read into your post using the filter of your past history. Shame on me.
Even still, my contention stands that there are people on both sides of the issue that use extreme statements for their political gain and economic gain. In the case of the economic issue, I simply don't see a real economic gain for the environmentalists. If their goal is to bring down corporate America, wouldn't they suffer monetarily as well?
As Robert says in an earlier post, Occam's Razor is the best test of these thoughts. There's certainly more incentive for corruption, greed, and deception in the message of the "Global warming is bunk" crowd than there is in the side warning of the dangers.
Art
by the way, I'm only about 50% sold on the global warming predictions based on human input alone. In many ways, based on the theories of warming triggering the next ice age, Arizona's not a bad place to be if it does come true. I've always liked Colorado and it would sure beat packing up and moving there to have it come to you.
Space/Science » in reply to re: Political weapon
re: Political weapon
The whole thread (48 posts)
- BBC on climate change hype
- African glaciers receeding and predicted to vanish within two decades
- re: BBC on climate change hype
- It's been generally agreed...
- Correct- it is Space/Science not just Space-science (n/t)
- agreed
- Ferchrisesake, this is where it belongs.... (n/t)
- It's been generally agreed...
- RealClimate.org was all over that one early.
- re: RealClimate.org
- Things are worse not better if warming causes all of the CO2 increase we find in the fossile record
- Did you read this?
- Are you ignoring the CO2 released from human hydrocarbon combustion on purpose? (n/t)
- The better side of judgement...
- re: RealClimate.org
