In the case of the economic issue, I simply don't see a real economic gain for the environmentalists. If their goal is to bring down corporate America, wouldn't they suffer monetarily as well?
The type of environmentalist I'm usually talking about is the radical environmentalist. The "watermelon." This does not include all environmentalists by any means. They are basically collectivists who are using environmentalism today where they used "economic democracy" and the "rule of the proletariat" before. The goals are the same: collectivized society under the rule of an elite. Guess who.
Of course they wouldn't suffer monetarily. These people are the ones who plan to end up in the Imperial Palaces. They always do. Forbes puts Fidel Castro's net worth at about $900 million.
Even now, how many people who claim to be environmentalists fly private jets and own several homes? They see no problem with this at all, and when confronted on it, are honestly confused.
Space/Science » in reply to re: Political weapon
re: Political weapon
The whole thread (48 posts)
- BBC on climate change hype
- African glaciers receeding and predicted to vanish within two decades
- re: BBC on climate change hype
- It's been generally agreed...
- Correct- it is Space/Science not just Space-science (n/t)
- agreed
- Ferchrisesake, this is where it belongs.... (n/t)
- It's been generally agreed...
- RealClimate.org was all over that one early.
- re: RealClimate.org
- Things are worse not better if warming causes all of the CO2 increase we find in the fossile record
- Did you read this?
- Are you ignoring the CO2 released from human hydrocarbon combustion on purpose? (n/t)
- The better side of judgement...
- re: RealClimate.org