Sorry, but it was impossible to resist. ;)
The problem with the "why not" argument is that the alternatives to a more measured approach are not cost-free. The panic proposals typically brought forward on this subject, like Kyoto, carry a serious economic and industrial penalty.
I have no problem with more reasonable ideas, like building more nuclear power plants, or encouraging alternatives (high prices do that on their own in the marketplace) There are plenty of reasons to reduce our use of oil even if CO2 was no issue at all. But God save us from the Chicken Littles with guns.
What happens all too often when a "crisis" is perceived is that our representatives in Washington (who mostly share, among other things, butt-ignorance about all things technological and economic) will run around in circles and then do something of colossal stupidity (see also: gasoline prices). This is totally bipartisan.
Space/Science » in reply to The better side of judgement...
Now you sound like Bush and Iraq...
The whole thread (48 posts)
- BBC on climate change hype
- African glaciers receeding and predicted to vanish within two decades
- re: BBC on climate change hype
- It's been generally agreed...
- Correct- it is Space/Science not just Space-science (n/t)
- agreed
- Ferchrisesake, this is where it belongs.... (n/t)
- It's been generally agreed...
- RealClimate.org was all over that one early.
- re: RealClimate.org
- Things are worse not better if warming causes all of the CO2 increase we find in the fossile record
- Did you read this?
- Are you ignoring the CO2 released from human hydrocarbon combustion on purpose? (n/t)
- The better side of judgement...
- re: RealClimate.org
