I remember that image from years ago, though not this particular version. After tracking down the original to get behind some heavy-handed image processing and see more of the surroundings, I determined that what it actually shows is a field of rectangular blocks, perhaps on a slope. It's one of those neatly ambiguous images that people seem to interpret based on suggestions from other people.
Can you see my interpretation now?
I've seen quite a few other images that could more plausibly argued show geysering. Robert Clark's found several images like that, I hope he weighs in. People have been theorizing about geysers for a long time, and several have claimed to have found them, so it's nice to see some scientific support for it. I just can't categorize that particular image as anything like geysering.
Space/Science » in reply to re: Image from Orbit
the "geyser" image
The whole thread (86 posts)
- The Geysers Of Mars
- re: The Geysers Of Mars
- re: The Geysers Of Mars
- This version of the story...
- re: Image from Orbit
- Maybe they're dust devils
- Hugh Kieffer deserves the credit
- the "geyser" image
- re: the "geyser" image
- CO2-water clathrates to explain the Martian spiders.
- re: They're everywhere!
- I had a nightmare like that once
- To each his own
- re: To each his own
- active geyser vs passive spot
- re: active geyser vs passive spot
- re: active geyser vs passive spot
- Mars does not have a bipolar magnetosphere
- re: active geyser vs passive spot
- re: active geyser vs passive spot
- re: active geyser vs passive spot
- re: active geyser vs passive spot
- re: active geyser vs passive spot
- Improved html with image (hopefully)
- re: active geyser vs passive spot
- active geyser vs passive spot
- re: To each his own
- re: Unpredictable
- Meanwhile, high above the Red Planet...
