Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to One world government

Planetary Federalism

It's good we have a basic agreement on something...but I find some your skepticism a bit hard to follow.

"Most modern "one world government" people and groups are collectivists and Marxists." I have to apply a steep discount because your Marxist/collectivist brush is so wide. If somebody's truly a Marxist, I'd think they'd be pushing something other than a representative democracy, in which case it's pretty much a moot point. OTOH, if somebody you think is a Marxist/collectivist proposes a system of representative democracy substantially the same as ours, would you object simply because of the source? That's the sticking point for me when I read your post: It sounds awfully doctrinaire to turn up your nose at a planetary federal representative democracy just because "Marxists" and "collectivists" favor it too.

A subtler subtext is nagging at me too: The implication that there's a "wrong" outcome from representative democracy, other than voting to give it up completely (and even then you have to give at least grudging respect to a decision freely reached). It seems an illogical proposition to think that you can predict the outcome if people are given broad freedom; wouldn't you think that just the opposite would occur, that maximum freedom means minimum predictability?

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (49 posts)