I think you are real determined not to support any moderation of the Republican party which suggests you are a rightwinger or a leftwinger not wanting to loose the independent votes that put Democrats in power last election. Your McCain will say anything line is not supported by any evidence you have provided. It was already pointed out there is a big difference between refusing to attack someone and tacking whatever stand he wants you to take to get elected. You haven't produced any substantive example of an issue flop by McCain to get elected (whether or not Falwell is an ass is not a major campain issue for McCain becuase he is not in office or supporting McCain). Show me a major contribution from Falwell to McCain preceding his comment and then I'll get pissed about that issue.
It's pretty damn simplistic to look at a number rating. If that is based simply on a percentage of vote in alignment with whatever group you choose to represent conservatism, it does nothing to measure willingness to buck party leadership on key issues except obviously for those with low ratings. McCain has been on the outside on campain reform, more troops for Iraq, and criticizing deficit spending, as well as worked on other major issues with moderates. Two of the three examples I listed are not likely to win him disfavor with conservative groups yet do buck the current Republican momentum.
Finally, since I don't look for conservative groups to do my thinking for me I have no idea how rightwing this group you listed is. Again try actually addressing issues to demonstrate your point.
Flame » in reply to OK, so we threw out McCain is principled.
Dedicated Leftwinger?
The whole thread (55 posts)
- Global warming is nonsense
- Note to FrankC: your call on this one.
- I find myself wanting to say...
- re: I find myself wanting to say...
- I find myself watning to say Global Warming is Nonsense
- The notion appeals to me
- That's BS...
- A couple of pennies tossed in the fountain o'flame
- I've no issues with how climate science posts have been handled at Space.
- Interesting thread
- Give it time
- An honest discussion would admit current CO2 levels are actually ~380ppm.
- Then CO2's effect on temperature is even less
- AND your scientific credentials are....?
- You might want to finish the reference paper I linked. (n/t)
- Then CO2's effect on temperature is even less
- Like I said
- Pro-human-caused-warming, Space Board. Objections? Flame Board.
- Rational debate:- Space Board. Name-calling:- Flame Board. (n/t)
- Science based debate, Space Board. Limbaugh-CEI subjective regurge. Flame Board. (n/t)
- As far as I can tell from what EP said, then you added the human-caused clause to what he said.
- A couple of pennies tossed in the fountain o'flame
- That's BS...
- The notion appeals to me
- I find myself wanting to say...
- re: Global warming is nonsense
- re: Global warming is nonsense
- Do you try to be controvercial so people will interact with you?
- Note to FrankC: your call on this one.
