This is one of those times, gb. While I couldn't follow your thinking all that well, the maliciousness came through loud and clear. I don't need to speak for Bowser and Lindy here, because I'm sure they'll eviscerate you in their own tender way at their own playful pace. Ever tried to take a mouse away from a couple of playful cats?
But I do take strong exception to you putting words in my mouth, with all that babbling about how I think of you as a "republican" and a "coward" and "a little sneak" (but here on Flame, I'd be repeating myself). Since you're batting only 33%, you owe me an apology on points.
For the rest of the rant, I refer you to Rob's original post, which I don't think you read before trying to jump all over me. You might find the answer to whatever was bugging you about my use of your name alongside SDAI-Tech1. I was responding to what Rob wrote: "Tech1 and gbaikie refuse to sheathe their swords and fight alongside Tom in defending the conservative ideology". Sword not sheathed = sword being wielded. Get it? QED, if Rob thinks of you and Techie in the same breath as TB, he's noticing you three, and it's fair to conclude that least for him, you're in the spotlight too. You should be flattered, gb.
Flame » in reply to re: Definitely not
"I'm...often baffled by gbaikie"
The whole thread (65 posts)
- The way I see it...
- No
- Hear, hear Rob
- I'm not calling for anyone leaving at this time.
- Absolutely not.
- Definitely not
- ROFLMAO!
- The issue, Robert...
- I would add to that
- re: Definitely not
- "Disarray"
- And your point would be? (n/t)
- re: The way I see it...
- I'm going to keep my inner R.L. caged for the moment...
- re: The way I see it...
- re: The way I see it...
