Gamma-ray bremstrahlung at 0.1 c???

Space/Science » in reply to A starship travelling at 0.1cee

Gamma-ray bremstrahlung at 0.1 c???

Adam — 5/20/2007 1:23:28 AM (archived)

Hi SDF

I very much doubt you'd get gamma-rays from proton bremstrahlung at that speed. And there's been analyses that magnetic deflection of the proton flux won't produce serious bremstrahlung until over ~ 0.8 c. Where did you get your figures from?

Adam

The whole thread (31 posts)

Thoughts on Gliese 581c, et al. - Bowser - 4/29/2007 10:40:31 PM
- re: Thoughts on Gliese 581c, et al. - Pierre - 5/19/2007 1:31:46 AM
- Here's an artist's depiction - phil - 5/2/2007 4:45:45 PM
  - re: Here's an artist's depiction. -Thanks, Phil! - Marcia - 5/2/2007 6:49:29 PM
    - re: Here's an artist's depiction. -Thanks, Phil! - phil - 5/3/2007 1:37:42 AM
- Finally a Planet in the Habitable Zone. - The Bees - 5/1/2007 9:39:27 AM
- I don't believe interstellar colonization is possible - SDF - 4/30/2007 10:11:29 PM
  - Whatever happened to those generation ships you designed? (n/t) - FrankC - 5/3/2007 5:39:07 PM
  - We canâ€™t assume aliens will have the same life spans as we do. Or the same life requirements. - REB - 5/1/2007 12:41:06 PM
    - Even an inanimate object would probably be unrecognizable after travelling between the stars. - SDF - 5/1/2007 8:56:33 PM
      - Would explain the porosity - Adam - 5/20/2007 1:29:14 AM
  - Of course it's possible. - Lee - 5/1/2007 3:13:55 AM
    - A starship travelling at 0.1cee - SDF - 5/1/2007 8:53:31 PM
      - Gamma-ray bremstrahlung at 0.1 c??? - Adam - 5/20/2007 1:23:28 AM
      - A thermonuclear Orion could do it. - Lee - 5/2/2007 1:35:47 AM
      - There was a time when going to the Moon was impossible. - REB - 5/1/2007 9:31:11 PM
        
        We haven't colonized the moon either - SDF - 5/1/2007 10:27:52 PM
      - And 0.02cee is 250-times faster than New Horizons, the fastest spacecraft ever (n/t) - SDF - 5/1/2007 9:03:04 PM
- Thought-provoking indeed - McFly - 4/30/2007 8:22:58 PM
- "we have the technology to get there" NOT - Sawyer - 4/30/2007 1:02:18 PM
- Exoplanet hunters' Graal:Earth's twin - Raoul - 4/30/2007 7:29:29 AM
- Odds of advanced intelligent life on a (relatively) nearby habitable planet are extremely remote. - Buck Galaxy - 4/30/2007 4:34:26 AM
  - Concerned about disease? - phil - 5/1/2007 1:05:04 AM
  - Don't drink the water. - ER - 4/30/2007 12:40:33 PM
    - ER has an excellent point - TB - 5/1/2007 4:45:21 AM
      - Then there is terraforming. - REB - 5/1/2007 12:59:05 PM
        
        Maybe you could expand the radius of a planet...Without increasing the mass. - The Artist formerly known as Scott Evil - 5/2/2007 9:59:17 PM
        
        We can do this one after we do the TOWG. - The Artist formerly known as Scott Evil - 5/2/2007 10:06:56 PM
      - re: ER has an excellent point - REB - 5/1/2007 12:51:05 PM
      - I just noticed that Sawyer made the same point. Sorry! (n/t) - TB - 5/1/2007 4:46:29 AM
  - That it's a remote possibility is a given. - Bowser - 4/30/2007 5:01:30 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (31 posts)