It is an old and recurring pastime, around here. At the time, I did not know enough about you or your beliefs to have an informed opinion.
Your latest post seems to claim that it includes proof that your musical messages are created by ETIs, if I understand correctly. I do not see that proof. I don't think that your post aludes to proofs outside of the post either. I would love to see such proof and I would dearly love to hear from ETs.
I also think that there's not a shred of the em spectrum that is "ignored" by astronomers. That these astronomers do not think there is anything to investigate in your claim means only that there are two points of view in play. If you come up with something that resembles proof, you will find a great deal of interest in your idea.
There is a whole field of study that seeks to differentiate between random noise and intellegible signal. Submit your signals to those algorithms and see what happens, is my advice. That would be evidence of something extraordinary, if they showed a probability of a non-random source for them.
Off Topic » in reply to Music from Space Part III
We were discussing Johannes' crackpot theory.
The whole thread (87 posts)
- Music from Space and Unified Field Theory
- Music Vii
- re: Thanks (n/t)
- Music from Space VI
- Music V
- Music from Space IV
- Music from Space Part III
- Music from Space Part II
- Music from Space Part II
- re: Music from Space and Unified Field Theory
- re: Music from Space and Unified Field Theory
- James.......
- Ever notice how really shaky ideas...
- re: Ever notice ....
- Debate is not really how good science is determined.
- re: Verifiable predictions
- Science does not usually require bravery; only intellegence.
- re: In that case, I’ll rephrase the question.
- I'm sorry, there are too many theories on the playing field.
- re: Let us back track a little bit
- What does Mr. Anderton's gobbledygook have to do with monopoles and gravity?
- re: Mr Anderton was talking, among other things, about
- OK.
- Wait...
- re: Some people doubt your words
- Where's Marshall McLullen when you need him?
- re: Some people doubt your words
- re: Mr Anderton was talking, among other things, about
- What does Mr. Anderton's gobbledygook have to do with monopoles and gravity?
- re: Let us back track a little bit
- I'm sorry, there are too many theories on the playing field.
- Now that I think about it, I can make a prediction for you.
- re: In that case, I’ll rephrase the question.
- Science does not usually require bravery; only intellegence.
- re: Debate is not really how good science is determined. - Thanks, generous, Al.
- re: Verifiable predictions
- Mr Anderton can start talking
- Debate is not really how good science is determined.
- re: Ever notice ....
- Ever notice how really shaky ideas...
- James.......
- Music Vii
