It has nothing to do with science, other than some stolen terminology.
It is possible that you do not understand my question or you do not understand its importance. If one claims to be able to show something with an equation, then one can demonstrate how the mathmatical link is made. It does not require being able to derive the equation (I can grasp some of the ramifications of E=MC*2, for instance, though my math studies stopped short of Lorentz transformations.). And it certainly does not require a reliance on philosophy nor religion.
There is simply no place for miracles in mathmatics. If your proof requires one or if it requires application of religion or philosophy or faith, then it is no proof. In some other universe than ours, maybe it would. But we have to play the hand we are dealt. If you really want to make a contribution (you seem quite passionate about it) then start at the bottom and work your way up - take all the math and physics you can at your local community college. I recommend you also study a science that is built upon experimentation using inductive logic as well. Come back when you've completed it, in 2 years or so and we can have this discussion again from a new perspective.
Off Topic » in reply to re: Please read the information
ok I scanned it
The whole thread (87 posts)
- Music from Space and Unified Field Theory
- Music Vii
- re: Thanks (n/t)
- Music from Space VI
- Music V
- Music from Space IV
- Music from Space Part III
- Music from Space Part II
- Music from Space Part II
- re: Music from Space and Unified Field Theory
- re: Music from Space and Unified Field Theory
- James.......
- Ever notice how really shaky ideas...
- re: Ever notice ....
- Debate is not really how good science is determined.
- re: Verifiable predictions
- Science does not usually require bravery; only intellegence.
- re: In that case, I’ll rephrase the question.
- I'm sorry, there are too many theories on the playing field.
- re: Let us back track a little bit
- What does Mr. Anderton's gobbledygook have to do with monopoles and gravity?
- re: Mr Anderton was talking, among other things, about
- OK.
- Wait...
- re: Some people doubt your words
- Where's Marshall McLullen when you need him?
- re: Some people doubt your words
- re: Mr Anderton was talking, among other things, about
- What does Mr. Anderton's gobbledygook have to do with monopoles and gravity?
- re: Let us back track a little bit
- I'm sorry, there are too many theories on the playing field.
- Now that I think about it, I can make a prediction for you.
- re: In that case, I’ll rephrase the question.
- Science does not usually require bravery; only intellegence.
- re: Debate is not really how good science is determined. - Thanks, generous, Al.
- re: Verifiable predictions
- Mr Anderton can start talking
- Debate is not really how good science is determined.
- re: Ever notice ....
- Ever notice how really shaky ideas...
- James.......
- Music Vii
