re: Verifiable predictions

Off Topic » in reply to Debate is not really how good science is determined.

re: Verifiable predictions

Johannes — 7/28/2007 12:49:29 AM (archived)

How about this prediction: THERE IS NO MAGNETIC MONOPOLE.

I have not figured out how to test the theory but I can tell you the reason why it is so.

Before you can understand the â€œreasoningâ€ you must understand the formula that predicts it.

The formula is explained at this web site: space-religion.com

The formula predicts many other things that are difficult to prove, such things as: Gravity is associated with mass but is not â€œcaused by it.â€

Not only does it predict those things, it explains why electron orbitâ€™s around the nuclei are stable only at certain â€œshells.â€

Are you brave enough to tackle the problem of verifying the theory?

The whole thread (87 posts)

Music from Space and Unified Field Theory - Roger Anderton - 7/26/2007 9:34:36 PM
- Music Vii - Roger - 12/15/2008 11:08:46 AM
  - re: Thanks (n/t) - Johannes - 12/15/2008 10:19:29 PM
- Music from Space VI - Roger Anderton - 11/29/2008 12:35:17 AM
- Music V - Roger - 8/14/2008 9:28:45 PM
  - Its WONDERFUL to know that the HZ is getting known as a reference for such things.... - ARRELL - 8/15/2008 5:47:41 AM
- Music from Space IV - Roger Anderton - 12/7/2007 10:12:04 PM
  - Thank you - Lindy - 12/8/2007 5:09:33 AM
- Music from Space Part III - Roger Anderton - 11/18/2007 9:57:43 PM
  - re: I tend to believe you - Johannes - 11/21/2007 5:30:47 AM
    - "Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do." - Ben Rich - 11/21/2007 5:07:34 PM
      - re: "Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do." - Roger Anderton - 11/25/2007 8:05:51 PM
        
        You presume right - Lindy - 11/25/2007 10:40:56 PM
  - We were discussing Johannes' crackpot theory. - alcaray - 11/19/2007 10:38:57 PM
    - re: We were discussing Johannes' crackpot theory. - Roger Anderton - 11/20/2007 6:05:45 PM
    - re: We were discussing Johannes' crackpot theory. - Roger Anderton - 11/20/2007 6:05:39 PM
      - re: We were discussing Johannes' crackpot theory. - Roger Anderton - 11/20/2007 8:34:34 PM
- Music from Space Part II - Roger Anderton - 7/31/2007 8:43:08 PM
  - re: Music from Space Part II - Kristen - 8/20/2007 4:00:52 PM
  - re: Music from Space Part II - James Brown - 7/31/2007 8:49:53 PM
    - Regarding sound waves in space - New Age Vapors - 7/31/2007 8:57:34 PM
      - What's next? A discussion of the tetractys? (n/t) - podrock - 8/1/2007 2:46:07 AM
- Music from Space Part II - Roger Anderton - 7/31/2007 8:43:03 PM
- re: Music from Space and Unified Field Theory - James Brown - 7/28/2007 3:54:20 AM
- re: Music from Space and Unified Field Theory - Lindy - 7/26/2007 10:30:45 PM
  - James....... - Lindy - 7/27/2007 5:49:09 PM
    - Ever notice how really shaky ideas... - The Acrimonious Academic - 7/27/2007 6:30:23 PM
      - re: Ever notice .... - Lindy - 7/27/2007 6:49:52 PM
        
        Debate is not really how good science is determined. - alcaray - 7/27/2007 7:45:17 PM
        
        re: Verifiable predictions - Johannes - 7/28/2007 12:49:29 AM
        
        Science does not usually require bravery; only intellegence. - alcaray - 7/28/2007 3:50:23 AM
        
        re: In that case, Iâ€™ll rephrase the question. - Johannes - 7/28/2007 10:00:32 PM
        
        I'm sorry, there are too many theories on the playing field. - alcaray - 7/28/2007 10:52:06 PM
        
        re: Let us back track a little bit - Johannes - 7/29/2007 12:45:33 AM
        
        What does Mr. Anderton's gobbledygook have to do with monopoles and gravity? - alcaray - 7/29/2007 1:04:04 AM
        
        re: Mr Anderton was talking, among other things, about - Johannes - 7/30/2007 1:51:51 AM
        
        OK. - alcaray - 7/30/2007 4:44:30 AM
        
        re: OK. - Johannes - 7/30/2007 10:40:48 PM
        
        Remember when I asked what theory you made the prediction for? - alcaray - 7/31/2007 12:14:56 AM
        
        re:There is no flipping or flopping. - Johannes - 8/1/2007 3:43:29 AM
        
        I won't quibble. - alcaray - 8/1/2007 7:59:11 AM
        
        re: Please read the information - Johannes - 8/1/2007 2:08:01 PM
        
        ok I scanned it - alcaray - 8/1/2007 6:42:11 PM
        
        re: ok I scanned it - Java Yeti - 8/2/2007 5:29:19 PM
        
        Yeesh, last time I try to format java pseudocode on the HZ (n/t) - Yeti - 8/2/2007 5:30:13 PM
        
        Wait... - The Acrimonious Academic - 7/30/2007 2:44:09 AM
        
        re: Some people doubt your words - Johannes - 7/30/2007 10:27:16 PM
        
        Where's Marshall McLullen when you need him? - The Acrimonious Academic - 7/31/2007 3:23:00 PM
        
        re: Do not be afraid, I am not trying to convert you - Johannes - 8/1/2007 4:33:09 AM
        
        Why thank you for calling me an irresponsible child - New Age Vapors - 8/1/2007 4:40:28 AM
        
        re: Do not feel too bad. - Johannes - 8/1/2007 2:46:09 PM
        
        I can't - New Age Vapors - 8/1/2007 3:19:25 PM
        
        re: Where's Marshall McLullen when you need him? - Yeti - 8/1/2007 2:39:37 AM
        
        re: What is it with you two brothers. - Johannes - 8/1/2007 3:28:48 PM
        
        Not worth my time, Johannes. (n/t) - Yeti - 8/2/2007 3:47:56 PM
        
        Is "scientifically" a dirty word now, that needs to be put in quotation marks? (n/t) - alcaray - 8/1/2007 8:44:07 PM
        
        re: NO, but words such as - Johannes - 8/1/2007 10:38:13 PM
        
        Then why did you quote that term? (n/t) - alcaray - 8/2/2007 2:32:26 AM
        
        re: I used it for emphasis. - Johannes - 8/7/2007 2:15:43 AM
        
        You need to look up what quotation marks are for. They are not to lend emphasis. (n/t) - alcaray - 8/7/2007 11:57:17 PM
        
        Because he thinks it makes him sound intelligent - 'Evil' Yeti - 8/2/2007 5:11:08 PM
        
        re: Why do you insist on flaming people on Off Topic? - Johannes - 8/7/2007 1:57:24 AM
        
        "Vomiting noise?" - Vaporless - 8/1/2007 5:35:55 AM
        
        Ah, yes, its Lindy. I Thought so. (n/t) - Yeti - 8/2/2007 4:50:26 PM
        
        Uncool, Lindy. (n/t) - podrock - 8/2/2007 5:19:47 PM
        
        Post crap like this under the handle you commonly use here - Yeti - 8/2/2007 3:18:17 PM
        
        re: Post crap like this under the handle you commonly use here - Lindy - 8/2/2007 9:37:17 PM
        
        re: Post crap like this under the handle you commonly use here - Yeti - 8/2/2007 9:42:32 PM
        
        "No, I didn't." - Lindy - 8/2/2007 10:08:22 PM
        
        Now that I think about it, I can make a prediction for you. - alcaray - 7/28/2007 6:06:11 AM
        
        re: Debate is not really how good science is determined. - Thanks, generous, Al. - Marcia - 7/27/2007 10:28:36 PM
        
        ET is a culture thing - Raoul - 7/28/2007 3:36:18 PM
        
        Mr Anderton can start talking - The Acrimonious Academic - 7/27/2007 7:04:40 PM
        
        Pamela Gay summed up this debate issue quite well - New Age Vapors - 7/31/2007 8:28:45 PM
        
        You can't reason with a child who believes in Santa Claus. - ER - 7/31/2007 11:16:51 PM
        
        Behold: - Jody B. - 8/1/2007 11:35:31 AM
        
        Jody, Jody, Jody... - ER - 8/1/2007 12:56:25 PM
        
        Elisee Reclus and Sheep/Acrimonious/Vapors - Jody - 8/2/2007 1:06:21 PM
        
        The Scotch Verdict - ER - 8/2/2007 3:49:18 PM
        
        Thank You, ER. (n/t) - Jody - 8/2/2007 6:31:23 PM
        
        make that a double - podrock - 8/2/2007 6:10:55 PM
        
        ER...ER...ER - Jody - 8/1/2007 1:23:17 PM
        
        ER...ER..oops - ER - 8/1/2007 1:38:31 PM
        
        Time for your meds, Jody? - New Age Vapors - 8/1/2007 1:27:14 PM
        
        :) (n/t) - Jody - 8/1/2007 2:11:56 PM
        
        Nope...I just have the vapors (n/t) - Jody - 8/1/2007 1:57:50 PM
        
        Thank you, ER - New Age Vapors - 8/1/2007 4:36:05 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (87 posts)