You're descending into incoherency. The topic was BOEHNER. You have danced all around, making excuses for him because of what you perceive as everyone else's weaknesses, limitations. If you can't focus on the question on hand, I can get you some eyeglasses although I don't think they'd help much.

You said, ^"Me, I don't want "effective" leadership as much as I want a leadership that has the right principles of government."^ IOW you don't care if the Republican agenda gets through Congress successfully? Personally, I'm happy Boehner is making a muck of it since I don't agree with how the Republicans would handle the economy or jobs or damn near anything. They wasted time and energy repealing the Health Care package knowing that it will never get through the Senate and that Obama would veto it anyway. When they waste their time on something they know won't fly, they are also wasting MY tax dollars and your tax dollars, money that could be better spent on other important things, like helping the jobless get back to work. However, Boehner says that if Government workers lose their jobs due to curtailment of government services, "So be it." He could have said something to the effect of, "We'll do our best to help these people find jobs in the private sector or move them into other government jobs where people are retiring..." But no, Mr. Ineffectual doesn't care about John Doe's job as long as he can cry in front of the camera to show how caring he is. Personally, I think he's a drip (pun intended).

What the hell does lynching Clarence Thomas have to do with BOEHNER? You seem to have a Thomas fetish.