At the moment of conception, when a unique strand of DNA is formed, we have a new human. At that point, it no longer is just the woman’s rights or body we are talking about, there is another living human involved.
Pro-choice want to make this an argument against women’s rights. It’s not. I think women are as equal as men and should have every rights men do. I think the government should do more to protect women from rapist.
With apportion, we are dealing with another life, who has a right to live as well. Just because they can’t defend themselves is no reason to kill them.
And before anyone tells me I have no right to say anything about this because I am a man, I was adopted. Abortions were designed to kill people like me. I have every right to speak out against something designed to kill those like me.
Off Topic » in reply to Re: The problem of pain
Re: The problem of pain
The whole thread (41 posts)
- More on NARAL and its founder
- Dastardly. Criminal. Absolutely reprehensible.
- Re: a new identity, hummmm!
- Likewise in UK
- Re: a new identity, hummmm!
- Publius is right, plus thay've owned Kraft and many others for years n/t (n/t)
- Re: Altria -what is it?
- The first A in NARAL
- Re: The problem of pain
- Re: The problem of pain
- Nathanson
- "If you hold the position that a third-trimester baby can't feel pain, then I think we have reached an impasse in this argument."
- Re: The first A in NARAL
- Re: The problem of pain
