It all comes down to this. As soon as conception takes place, and a unique strand of DNA forms, we have an individual unique and separate from it’s parents.
This first cell is unlike any in a woman’s body. This cell is the start of a new human. Right away it starts building itself.
Killing it because it hasn’t reached a cetain stage in it DEVELOPMENT, or because it can’t do this or that is not a good reason. We could use the same argument to kill many disabled adults.
-A fertilized egg has the DNA of a unique individual separate from its parents.
-A fertilized egg contains the blue prints for a unique individual. This DNA starts building that person right away.
-A fertilized egg between two human parents is human(it’s not a dog, cat or anything else) and it is alive.
-A fertilized human egg is the start of a human life.
Like I said before, we don’t magically become humans at birth. Who we are is there in our DNA from day one.
Off Topic » in reply to Re: No one contests its uniqueness, only its identity
Exactly, Steve.
The whole thread (41 posts)
- More on NARAL and its founder
- Dastardly. Criminal. Absolutely reprehensible.
- Re: a new identity, hummmm!
- Likewise in UK
- Re: a new identity, hummmm!
- Publius is right, plus thay've owned Kraft and many others for years n/t (n/t)
- Re: Altria -what is it?
- The first A in NARAL
- Re: The problem of pain
- Re: The problem of pain
- Nathanson
- "If you hold the position that a third-trimester baby can't feel pain, then I think we have reached an impasse in this argument."
- Re: The first A in NARAL
- Re: The problem of pain