The Wall Street Journal is so unashamedly rightist that I don't even bother writing to them like I frequently write to the Washington Times. It would be like trying to clean up after a hippopotamus who has just eaten a truckload of Ex-Lax. Think of a newspaper written entirely by Tom, only without about half the brains.
The WSJ has so many opinions they had to open a separate Web site to house them. This is all the opinion on just that front page. A solid spew of rightist blather, with no exceptions.
It's full of class warfare crap, from people who apparently believe that no wealthy person ever inherited what he has. Of course, declaring all wealth as legitimately acquired is what gives a rightist "moral authority" to hang on to that wealth. Wealth in the hands of a right-winger is then "good" wealth.
Most such media outlets (The Washington Times, Fox network, etc.) have given up pretending they're objective, and have happily settled into their role as Republican keisterweasels, with the single goal of destroying all opposition to Bush and the Republicans.
--Bom Toszr
(Tom's mirror-image avatar, as channeled by Robert)
Off Topic » in reply to Ah, the unbiased media...
Ah, the unbiased media...
The whole thread (37 posts)
- Ah, the unbiased media...
- Example from an art review in the LA Times
- Opinion pieces are supposed to be biased. Should I start whining because Rush does not present a balance of opinion? n/t (n/t)
- Tom..a favor please!
- Washington Times, WSJ, etc. Blah blah blah. n/t (n/t)
- Coding typo again...
- Reality check
- Ah, the unbiased media...