I think the point I was making is that almost ALL the opinion pieces in this particular paper are biased in a single direction, if "biased" can be used to describe the rampant leftism.
And the difference to be remembered is, Rush is a conservative and proudly proclaims it on many occasions. The editorial staff of the San Francisco Chronicle would swear on their mothers' graves that they were the soul of objectivity, and that only a right-wing conspiracy nut could possibly think they were biased toward the left.
The scary thing is, that a lot of them truly believe it. Most journalists don't notice their own biases in that environment any more than a fish notices that it's wet.
And I notice no one has risen to my bait of counting conservative newspapers and comparing it to the count of liberal ones.
"Wall Street Journal, Fox News, Washington Times....uh...National Review.....er...uh...."
Off Topic » in reply to Opinion pieces are supposed to be biased. Should I start whining because Rush does not present a balance of opinion? n/t
Re: Opinion pieces are supposed to be biased
The whole thread (37 posts)
- Ah, the unbiased media...
- Example from an art review in the LA Times
- Opinion pieces are supposed to be biased. Should I start whining because Rush does not present a balance of opinion? n/t (n/t)
- Tom..a favor please!
- Washington Times, WSJ, etc. Blah blah blah. n/t (n/t)
- Coding typo again...
- Reality check
- Ah, the unbiased media...
