When you decided to speak seriously, you say>
"Seriously, the lure of liberalism is an entire article in itself, and depends on how its being defined. Not sure I want to tackle it."
A long time ago, I wrote a l o n g post on the subject. And now I agree with you. SDAI wouldn't understand it anyway. It was longer than his attention span would admit.
Understand the short term memory receptors return after even long term use when you do get off the grass.
Pity the poor liberals. They never know the good for others. They can only define it for themselves so they are unable to say what others should do. They can only say what others should not be prohibited from doing.
How limited.
Publius
Off Topic » in reply to Emotions Not Good Judge of Reality
Re: Emotions Not Good Judge of Reality
The whole thread (37 posts)
- Ah, the unbiased media...
- Example from an art review in the LA Times
- Opinion pieces are supposed to be biased. Should I start whining because Rush does not present a balance of opinion? n/t (n/t)
- Tom..a favor please!
- Washington Times, WSJ, etc. Blah blah blah. n/t (n/t)
- Coding typo again...
- Reality check
- Ah, the unbiased media...
