Bowser is another case entirely, but that is not relevant or significant.
What I would challenge you to think about is that since 1996 the democrats have a documented pattern of diregarding the law when it is convenient.
They are now documented as committing massive violations of election law in 1996.
They did in fact pre-plan the contest of the Florida election, hiring telemarketing firms to tell people that they might have voted for Buchanan.
They in fact did try to perform an illegal recount multiple times after the recounts failed to support their false claim, that gore had won.
They in fact did try to have legally cast ballots tossed out in Republican Counties in Florida.
And now, they seek to change a candidate simply because that candidate might lose.
Yet your only comment is that the Republicans might not have time to dig up negatives.
Toricelli's illegal and unethical actions are a matter of public record. It is not negative to point that out.
It was unethical of the dems in the Senate to cover this up.
Ed
Current Events » in reply to Thank you for your opinion
MA, I no serious person would consider you an idiot.
The whole thread (28 posts)
- New Jersey voters' "Right to Choose"