(Damn, hit return again. I ALWAYS do that)
My response would be a reiteration oof exactly what Tom metioned, that the heat does not need to melt the lteel, that even relatively low temps could cause maojr weakening. I won't repeat it here, you can read it below again if you want.
But, to the "A Mr. Val Romero, went on record stating that the collapse of the towers bore all the characteristics of a controlled-demolition."
If the terrorists are trying to cause as much death and havoc as possible, WHY would they plant explosives to cause the towers to fall sraight down in a neat, controlled demolition? One of the biggest things to be thankful for after this attack is that they DIDN'T topple to the side and take out another whole city block.
Current Events » in reply to Towers of Deceit
Thanks Tom
The whole thread (56 posts)
- What we know, and don't know, about 911
- Re: Item 8 -- slight revision
- Oh ya
- Towers of Deceit
- P.S. Note the mental impermeability displayed here
- Speaking as someone who actually knows something about structural steel...
- Name correction and Romero link
- Towering Deceit is a gret name for what the wackjobs have done to lie about 911.
- Thanks Tom
- Thanks (n/t)
- Towers of Deceit
- Re: What we know, and don't know, about 911
- Re: What we know, and don't know, about X-mas
- You post this even though you know you are wrong.
- Re: What we know, and don't know, about 911
- Re: What you don't know about 911
