If there had been a TV at Booker, as Pres. Bush has told us, it is reasonable to assume that the school's principal would have learned of WTC via that medium, rather than directly from the President, as she has stated.
There is no precedent for a plane flying into a building in perfect weather. Police on the scene in NY knew immediately that it was no accident, and we might reasonably assume that the Secret Service would have reached the same conclusion. These are not dumb folks.
By all accounts, Pres. Bush did not leave Booker until 9:30. That fact, in and of itself, raises very serious questions.
Thanks for your comments, but I would like to see you address Pres. Bush's obvious dissembling about how he first learned of the first WTC strike.
Good luck,
sp
Current Events » in reply to Sinking fast....
Re: Sinking fast....
The whole thread (56 posts)
- What we know, and don't know, about 911
- Re: Item 8 -- slight revision
- Oh ya
- Towers of Deceit
- P.S. Note the mental impermeability displayed here
- Speaking as someone who actually knows something about structural steel...
- Name correction and Romero link
- Towering Deceit is a gret name for what the wackjobs have done to lie about 911.
- Thanks Tom
- Thanks (n/t)
- Towers of Deceit
- Re: What we know, and don't know, about 911
- Re: What we know, and don't know, about X-mas
- You post this even though you know you are wrong.
- Re: What we know, and don't know, about 911
- Re: What you don't know about 911