<Your clever satire notwithstanding, the facts I've posted stand unchallenged, but I'm a patient man - at least on good days - so I'm hopeful someone here will take a real shot at one/any/all of the points I've posted here.
The shots have already been taken for over a year, now. Your refusal to see the facts and to realize them is the only real issue I see.
I'm off-line these days, so am grossly disconnected from my databases, but the points you list have been addressed, several times, and your repeated posting of your notorious list does nothing but ire those whom you refuse to accept -- and probably gain you airheaded support from the non-thinking half of the globe.
If you don't like the answers this board has already (and patiently, I might add) provided, why not try somewhere else?
Cheers,
Dan
Current Events » in reply to Funny
Re: thay have been challenged, right here on these boards, several times . . . (n/t)
The whole thread (56 posts)
- What we know, and don't know, about 911
- Re: Item 8 -- slight revision
- Oh ya
- Towers of Deceit
- P.S. Note the mental impermeability displayed here
- Speaking as someone who actually knows something about structural steel...
- Name correction and Romero link
- Towering Deceit is a gret name for what the wackjobs have done to lie about 911.
- Thanks Tom
- Thanks (n/t)
- Towers of Deceit
- Re: What we know, and don't know, about 911
- Re: What we know, and don't know, about X-mas
- You post this even though you know you are wrong.
- Re: What we know, and don't know, about 911
- Re: What you don't know about 911