Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to re Opinion about a manned space program

re: re Opinion about a manned space program

"Chris writes: In a sense this is part of the problem. With in the Space Fan community there is no consciences. There are at the base at least 4 groups.

Those who would have low cost launchers be the next thing so they can enjoy space tourism or some other business in space. "

This completely backwards and is example of how useless "Space Fans" are. About the only "valuable" thing space fans are doing is learning- and it's a slow process- one reason is there is confusion generated by these same "Fans"- and sometimes this generated confusion seems like it is being done on purpose.

The sub-orbitor spacecraft is lower cost than a orbitor. It's easier. There is probably a sizable market for sub-orbital flights. People who want to build sub-orbitors, [mainly] want to be more rich and famous, and/or want to make getting into space easier (CATS). They don't want govt getting into the business and competing with them (it's not fair competition).

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (34 posts)