He has touted it as a sure fire Mars life finder yet then posts an article acting as if it will take 50 to 100 years to answer the life on Mars question. All the cautionary notes finally making you nervous Barry or are you just once again grabbing inconsistant data to support your ant-Mars (No sample return & no Humans to Mars) program?
It should be noted that your author ignores the power of DNA testing to answer the question of whether life found on Mars is native or a contaminant. Why is it so many of your references seem so ignorant of actual biochemistry and microbiology tools Barry? Why is it that you continue ignore this easy answer after 5 years of debate? Do you not understand how DNA testing works or its just not convenient to your pet theories and positions?
Regards,
Mark
Space/Science » in reply to re: Human space flight will continue - but human Mars missions in the next century
Barry Must Have Lost Faith In Beagle 2
The whole thread (34 posts)
- the most scientific poll possible: An AOL poll...
- Guess again: the easily demonstrable obvious biases in the AOL poll
- re Opinion about a manned space program
- re: re Opinion about a manned space program
- re Opinion about a manned space program
- re: re Opinion about a manned space program
- re:Disagreeing groups
- re: How to do all of the above and then some....
- Nuclear Rockets to Jupoter's moons
- re: Human space flight will continue - but human Mars missions in the next century