Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to re: more likely obsessed and bitter

re: more likely obsessed and bitter
Mark Eby — (archived)

I stopped paying much attention to CCNet when the moderator starting wholesale copying of articles from "CO2 Science Magazine" a non refereed online magazine while ignoring CO2 science published in refereed journals and counter claims in sources just as credible. I don't know what exactly Pieser's agenda is, but dissing one future hazard based in part on computer models of climate while promoting another based in part on computer models of climate with an obvious bias in reporting data is hardly scientifically consistant or objective. The notable lapse in participation of the well known impact experts seemed to coincide although It just may have been coincidence that I noticed both about the same time. Search on Steele, Morrison, Chapman, Warden, and Stokes to get an objective evaluation of their participation over time. I haven't tried that, but they all have participated in the past.

Regards,
Mark

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (51 posts)