Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to Do you deny the charges?

Let's see if I understand exactly what you're saying...

First off, Alex, but a simple internet search on "Cambridge Conference" and "Grondine" provides direct links to my reportage for the last 5 years or so. It covers NASA's attempts to deal with the impact hazard, and little of it is favorable. But this seems to be an accurate appraisal of perfomance, in as much as it coincides with the views of many on the House Space Subcommittee.

I'm sorry: if there was better news I would be happy to report it - and I wish there was.

My earlier reporting for the preceding years is available in trade publications with limited (and expensive) professional circulation. I believe they're available at the Library of Congress, though I am not certain about this.

Now if someone is slandering me in an attempt to compromise my press credentials I am concerned.

Now what you've been hinting at in all these posts of yours is that:

You have personal knowledge which was relayed to your by individuals which you are currently unwilling to name of the following:

1) That I wrote threatening e-mails to NASA scientists, and that these have been reported to NASA security

2) That I intruded into office areas at HQ, and that this has been put in an incident report in the HQ security log

3) That this has resulted in me being put on a NASA security "watch list"

Is that exactly what you are saying?

ep

PS - When do we get our money back for all that watery Mars research?

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (51 posts)