Yeah, you're right. He's the living embodiment of the Orwell quote`
about some things being so stupid that only an intellectual can believe him. I guess the economic evidence of tax cuts stimulating the economy in the 1960s, the 1980s, and in the past couple years (and that's just the evidence from America) is too much for him to take. After all, if the evidence disagrees with his "scientific economic theories", then obviously the evidence must be mistaken.
You'd think that if the free lunch economics he's pushing were so good, there would no longer be such a thing as the business cycle, recessions, or poverty anywhere.